File: Russia

Version 7: Sat, Dec 28, 2024

Image: Red square Moscow cityscape - by Valerii Tkachenko - Wikipedia.

National Policy Issues

2020 Constitutional Amendments

Law on amendment to Russian Federation Constitution - Official announcement - March 14, 2020

The President signed the Law of the Russian Federation on introducing an amendment to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, On Improving the Regulation of Certain Aspects of the Organisation and Functioning of Public Authority

The Federal Law was approved by the State Duma and the Federation Council on March 11, 2020, and as of March 14, 2020, has been approved by legislative (representative) bodies of 85 constituent entities of the Russian Federation.

The Content of the 2020 Constitutional Amendments in Russia by Sergei Belov - The International Association of Constitutional Law (IACL-AIDC) Blog - Apr 01, 2021

Sergei Belov is Associate Professor of Constitutional Law, Chair of Constitutional Law Department, and Dean of the Law Faculty, St. Petersburg State University.

Russia’s Foreign Policy Concept

The Concept of the Foreign Policy of the Russian Federation Approved by Decree of the President of the Russian Federation - 31 March 2023 - (@MFA_Russia)

Russia’s Nuclear Doctrine

Fundamentals of State Policy of the Russian Federation on Nuclear Deterrence (3 December 2024) - Approved by the Executive Order of the President of the Russian Federation No.991 of November 19, 2024

Russia’s new nuclear doctrine ready – Kremlin RT - 29 Sep, 2024 - Archive

The changes to the document were necessary in light of growing Western involvement in the Ukraine conflict, Dmitry Peskov has said

The update was proposed by Russian President Vladimir Putin on Wednesday, who said that the nuclear strategy should consider “aggression against Russia by any non-nuclear state, but with the participation or support of a nuclear state,” as a “joint attack” that would trigger a nuclear response. The new rules could apply to a possible Ukrainian attack deep inside Russia with advanced weapons supplied by the West, or in case of a “massive” missile strike launched by Kiev against Russia or its closest ally, Belarus.

Interviews

Nuclear Conflict Risk, Ukraine, And Syria Escalation: Watch Lavrov’s interview with Tucker Carlson (With Full Transcript) Tucker Carlson talks with Sergei Lavrov - RT - Thu, 05 Dec 2024 - SOTT copy

---

Pivot to the East

By M.Bitton - Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, Link

Orthographic map centred on Siberia - Wikimedia

Dmitry Trenin in his article: Russia is undergoing a new, invisible revolution (link below)

Unlike in the previous decade, when Russia’s “turn to the east” was first announced, these are not just words. Our trade partners, not just political interlocutors, have also switched places. In just two years, the European Union, which only recently accounted for 48% of foreign trade, is down to 20%, whereas Asia’s share has soared from 26% to 71%. Russia’s use of the US dollar has also plummeted, with increasingly more transactions being conducted in Chinese yuan and other non-Western currencies such as the Indian rupee, the UAE dirham, as well as the instruments of our partners in the Eurasian Economic Union, and the ruble itself.

Sergey Karaganov in his article: Here’s why Russia must permanently abandon Europe and turn fully to Asia (link below)

He recognizes that Russia had a close relationship with Europe but that is now coming to an end:

The war provoked and unleashed by the West in Ukraine should not distract us from the movement towards the south and the east – where the center of human development is shifting. This new, but long foreseen, situation calls us to return to our “home.” A European journey of more than 300 years has given much, but long ago – a century ago, in reality – and has exhausted its usefulness.

Karaganov argues for a reorientation of Russia’s development strategy towards Siberia and Southeast Asia:

Now, the new geostrategic situation urgently requires a return to the original idea – the eastward turn of all of Russia through the primary development of all of Siberia, including, of course, the Urals. In other words, we are talking about the “Siberization” of the whole country. Western Europe will be closed for many years and should never again become a first-class partner, while Asia is developing rapidly.

He continues later on and clearly going beyond economic considerations (emphasis added):

The reorientation of the self-awareness and thinking of all our compatriots, the unity with the glorious Siberian past, present and future in the interests of the whole country will certainly find an echo in the hearts of the Siberians themselves. I repeat, we need a Siberian strategy for the whole of Russia, not just for the Urals, Siberia and the Far East.

The strategy should start not so much with dry economic calculations, although the existing ones are more than convincing – Novosibirsk scientists are exceptional – but with the spiritual and cultural return of the magnificent, breathtaking history of the exploration of Asian Russia to the center of Russian identity.

Practical proposals include:

• If Peter were alive today, he would certainly have founded a new capital in Siberia and greatly expanded the window to Asia. Along with Moscow and St. Petersburg, Russia desperately needs a third, Siberian capital. The military-strategic situation that will develop in the coming decades demands it.
• New meridional routes should be built, connecting southern Siberia with the Northern Sea Route, leading to China and through it to Southeast Asia.
• It is necessary to rebuild the Siberian machine-building industry on a modern basis, taking advantage of the flow of orders to defense enterprises.
• It is necessary to develop Siberia with its water resources, involving water-scarce, but labor-abundant Central Asian countries.
• We also need a national program for the development of Oriental studies, knowledge of Oriental languages, peoples and cultures in schools. Uniquely, culturally and religiously open Russia has a huge competitive advantage here, inherited from its ancestors who, unlike the Europeans, did not enslave and destroy but absorbed local peoples and cultures as they moved eastwards.

---

2024 BRICS Summit - Kazan, 22–24 October 2024

By Prime Minister’s Office (GODL-India), GODL-India, Link

BRICS representatives at the 2024 summit, from right to left: Mauro Vieira, Masoud Pezeshkian, Mohamed bin Zayed, Narendra Modi, Vladimir Putin, Xi Jinping, Cyril Ramaphosa, Abdel Fattah el-Sisi and Abiy Ahmed - Wikimedia.

Summit’s main theme was “Strengthening Multilateralism for Fair Global Development and Security.”

Official site: Russian 2024 BRICS Chairmanship - Documents

The Kazan BRICS Declaration — a New World Order Manifesto by Zhao Huasheng and Andrey Kortunov - Russian International Affairs Council - October 28, 2024

BRICS post-Kazan: A laboratory of the future by Pepe Escobar - The Cradle - Oct 30, 2024

The much-awaited BRICS heads of state meeting in Russia’s Kazan did not disappoint. The multilateral institution has finally brought bite and substance to many of the global financial and political conundrums that have long-challenged a genuine reshaping of the global order.

Rag Picking Through The Kazan Declaration – What President Putin Gained, What He Lost From BRICS 24 by John Helmer (@bears_with) - Archive

No, BRICS Isn’t Trying to Rival the West: The declaration from last week’s summit reads like a cri de coeur for the existing order By Nicholas Bequelin, senior fellow at Yale Law School’s Paul Tsai China Center and the former Asia-Pacific director of Amnesty International - Foreign Policy - Oct 30, 2024

And a globalist take on the summit:

BRICS looks increasingly like a paper tiger By Herbert Poenisch - Official Monetary and Financial Institutions Forum - 29 October 2024

“OMFIF is an independent think tank for central banking, economic policy and public investment, providing a neutral platform for public and private sector engagement worldwide. With teams in London and the US, OMFIF focuses on global policy and investment themes relating to central banks, sovereign funds, pension funds, regulators and treasuries. Global public investors with investable assets of $43tn are at the heart of this network.”

Neo-Ottoman NATO Member Turkey in BRICS? Is It Really a Good Idea? By Drago Bosnic - Global Research, September 06, 2024 - Archive

There’s virtually not a single US-orchestrated war that hasn’t been supported by Turkey, in one way or another. Whether it was in Korea, Yugoslavia or anywhere in the Middle East, Ankara has been working in concert with Washington DC since the 1950s. Nowadays, this is most evident in countries like Syria and Libya, where they directly support the same terrorist groups.

---

By Kaiserc - Own workPublic domain map by EIA: File:Former USSR Oil and Gas map.svgInformation on the route taken from the Russian Wikipedia’s article by: (see authors at the history page), CC0, Link

Map of the Siberian Route in the 18th century (green) and the early 19th century (red)

---

Academics and Officials

Timofey Bordachev

Timofey Bordachev Program Director of the Valdai Club.

Ukraine in the EU will only exacerbate the bloc’s growing irrelevance by Timofey Bordachev - Aug 26, 2023 - Archive

The EU is now dealing with the consequences of its huge strategic failure by Timofey Bordachev - Dec 14, 2023 - Archive

Serbia - The West hates this small country almost as much as Russia. Here’s why by Timofey Bordachev - 3 Apr, 2024 - Archive

This major pillar of Western civilization is crumbling. Here’s why: The collapse of the middle class is driving the abandonment of a system we believed was here to stay By Timofey Bordachev, Program Director of the Valdai Club - 15 Apr, 2024 - Archive

Olga Butorina

Dr. of Science (Economics), Corresponding Members of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Professor, Deputy Director for scientific work, RAS Institute of Europe, RIAC Member

The Draghi report interrupts the EU silent “family dinner” by Olga Butorina - RIAC - October 11, 2024 - Excerpts (emphasis added):

Economic growth was a top priority for the EU since its inception. This changed, however, in late 2019 when a new European Commission led by Ursula von der Leyen took office, shifting focus to the European Green Deal (i.e., achieving climate neutrality by 2050), digital transformation and building an economy that works for people.

The EU share of world GDP has been steadily shrinking lately, dropping from 21.8% in 2010 to 17.5% in 2023. In the meantime, the US share rose from 22.5 to 26.0%, and China’s share jumped from 9.2 to 17.0%. In 2021, for the first time ever, China overtook the EU by nominal GDP, finishing the year at $17.8 trillion versus the EU’s $17.3 trillion.

Perhaps no economist in the EU enjoys the same international acclaim as Mario Draghi. …

This is why the competitiveness report presented by Draghi deserves our full attention. It busts the myth that the green agenda makes growth irrelevant. Speaking with his usual candour, Draghi states in a separate paragraph, “Europe’s need for growth is rising.” He explains that the EU faces greater competition on global markets today, that it has lost Russia as its key energy supplier, and that it is weak in emerging technologies, in part because it largely missed out on the digital revolution. In addition, the demographic situation looks bleak: by 2040, the EU workforce is projected to shrink by 2 million workers each year.

Sergei Glazyev

Russian Economist Sergei Glazyev Praises the Thinking of Lyndon LaRouche, on the Centenary of His Birth - Executive Intelligence Review - Sept. 12, 2022

Russia’s Sergey Glazyev Introduces the New Global Financial System by Pepe Escobar - April 24, 2022 - Archive

Sergey Glazyev: ‘The road to financial multipolarity will be long and rocky’ by Pepe Escobar - Mar 13, 2024 Archive

Rocky Road to Dedollarization: Sergei Glazyev Interview by Pepe Escobar - Feb 28, 2024 - Archive

Sergei A. Karaganov

Sergey Karaganov is honorary chairman of Russia’s Council on Foreign and Defense Policy, and academic supervisor at the School of International Economics and Foreign Affairs, Higher School of Economics (HSE) in Moscow. From their site:

We are ranked among the top 100 institutions worldwide in Politics & International Studies, Sociology, History, Economics & Econometrics in the QS – World University Rankings by Subject.

“Russia cannot afford to lose, so we need a kind of a victory”: Sergey Karaganov on what Putin wants: A former adviser to the Kremlin explains how Russia views the war in Ukraine, fears over Nato and China, and the fate of liberalism By Bruno Maçães - New Statesman, 24 February 2023 - Archive

Russia is abuzz: The use of nuclear weapons can save humanity from a global catastrophe – Sergey Karaganov Global South, June 15, 2023 - Archive

Russia’s European Journey is Over Evgeny Shostakov, in conversation with Sergey Karaganov - Global South, January 6, 2024 - Archive

Here’s why Russia must permanently abandon Europe and turn fully to Asia: Europe is finished, and Russia’s geographical and cultural advantages means it doesn’t have to go down with the sinking ship By Professor Sergey Karaganov - Russia Today, Feb 10, 2024 - Archive

Geopolitical paradigm shifts and coping with psychopaths Tariq Marzbaan and Nora Hoppe interview Professor Sergei A. Karaganov - May 9, 2024 - (@MayadeenEnglish) - Archive

Decades of Wars? by Sergei A. Karaganov - May 24, 2024 - Russian International Affairs Council - Archive - Excerpts and discussion of this paper by T. Fazi below.

Russia must update nuclear doctrine to bolster deterrence - Former Kremlin advisor Sergey Karaganov By Al Mayadeen English - 12 Sep 2024 - Archive

Former Kremlin advisor Sergey Karaganov has urged Russia to revise its nuclear doctrine, advocating for a more aggressive stance that includes the possibility of a nuclear response to any major military aggression.

Andrey Kortunov

Ph.D. in History, Academic Director of the Russian International Affairs Council, RIAC Member

What BRICS Cannot and What It Can Deliver by Andrey Kortunov - Russian International Affairs Council - October 23, 2024

Dmitry Moiseev

PhD in Philosophy, Senior Lecturer at the HSE University

The U.S. Election and the Post-Westphalian World by Dmitry Moiseev et al. - RIAC - November 6, 2024

Additional authors:

• Maxim Sigachev PhD of Political Science, Research Fellow at Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations (IMEMO), Russian Academy of Sciences
• Sergei Arteyev Ph.D. in Political Science, Research Associate at the Institute of World Economy and International Relations of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO); Senior Lecturer at MGIMO University
• Pavel Skakun Independent researcher, lecturer at Dostoevsky Omsk State University

Tamara Ryzhenkova

Tamara Ryzhenkova (Рыженкова Тамара Алексеевна) is an orientalist, senior lecturer at the Department of History of the Middle East, St. Petersburg State University and an expert for the ‘Arab Africa’ Telegram channel

‘Colonization of the soul’: What made a European power fear this language? After many years of French language domination, former colonies in Africa are returning to their cultural roots by Tamara Ryzhenkova - RT - Thu, 03 Oct 2024 - Archive

In the 19th century, many European powers, including France, colonized Africa. From the outset, France waged a fierce campaign against Islamic culture and the Arabic language, striving to eliminate it from social and academic life and replace it with French. Colonial administrator Colonel Paul Marty, who served in Tunisia and Morocco and was an expert in the Arabic language, wrote about this in his book ‘Le Maroc de Demain’ (‘The Morocco of Tomorrow’), published in 1927.

“We must rigorously combat any attempt to provide education in Arabic, any intervention from Sharia scholars, and any manifestation of Islam. Only this way will we attract children, only through our own schools.”

Dmitry Trenin

Dmitry Trenin, a research professor at the Higher School of Economics and a lead research fellow at the Institute of World Economy and International Relations. He is also a member of the Russian International Affairs Council (RIAC).

Russia is undergoing a new, invisible revolution by Dmitry Trenin - RT - Tue, 02 Apr 2024 - Archive

Valentin Katasonov

Professor, Department of Moscow State Institute of International Finance, doctor of economic sciences, corresponding member of the Academy of Economics and Commerce. He was consultant of the United Nations (1991-1993), member of the Advisory Council to the President of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) (1993-1996), head of the Department of international monetary relations of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs Russia (2001-11)

Anglo-American money masters as the organizers of the Second World War by Valentin Katasonov - Strategic Culture Foundation - Sun, 03 May 2015 - Archive

Fyodor Lukyanov

Editor-in-chief of Russia in Global Affairs, chairman of the Presidium of the Council on Foreign and Defense Policy, and research director of the Valdai International Discussion Club.

Julian Assange has become a symbol of resistance to the US government by Fyodor Lukyanov - RT - 26 Jun, 2024 - Archive

Yevgeny Primakov

Lavrov predicts historians may coin new term: the Primakov Doctrine - TASS - Archive

Edward Lozansky

Edward Lozansky is an academic currently working at:

• Lomonosov Moscow State University
• National Research Nuclear University

Bio info from TNT Radio:

Edward Lozansky graduated from the Russian National Research Nuclear University and obtained his Ph.D. in theoretical nuclear physics at the Kurchatov Institute of Atomic Energy, equivalent to Los Alamos Lab. He was forced into exile in 1976 for criticizing Soviet foreign and domestic policies. After immigrating to the United States, he worked as a researcher at the Laser Fusion Lab at the University of Rochester, NY, and as a professor at the American University in Washington, DC. Following the collapse of the USSR, he founded the American University in Moscow to promote US-Russia science and educational exchanges. He currently serves as a professor at the National Research Nuclear University and Moscow State University and is the author of 14 books and several hundred science and political science articles in American and Russian media.

Edward Lozansky on Connecting the Dots with Matt Ehret ~56 min - Sunday Jan 28, 2024 - (@TNTRadioLive)

Edward Lozansky was close to the people involved in all the negotiations between Russia and the West starting in the 1980s and gives insights on the evolution of the geopolitical relationship since then.

Edward Lozansky’s commentary on Russia and geopolitical issues: New Kontinent

Authors and Journalists

Alexander Dugin

Multipolarity: An Era of Great Transition by Alexander Dugin - April 1, 2024 - Archive

Tucker Carlson releases interview with Russian philosopher Aleksandr Dugin: They discussed ‘new liberalism’ and its role in the fate of Western civilization (@RT_com) - 29 Apr, 2024 - Archive

Klaus Schwab, Transgenderism, and AI ~21min Tucker Carlson talks with Russian Philosopher Aleksandr Dugin

Sergey Poletaev

Sergey Poletaev is an information analyst and publicist, co-founder and editor of the Vatfor project on Telegram.

Putin just announced Russia’s own Monroe Doctrine by Sergey Poletaev - RT - Archive

On September 26, Russian President Vladimir Putin announced updates to the Foundations of State Policy of the Russian Federation in the Area of Nuclear Deterrence. The revised document implies that under certain conditions, Moscow may consider a proxy war against itself as justification for using nuclear weapons.

Western viewpoints on Russia

American Censorship Intensifies in the Information War: Some reflections after being cancelled / banned by YouTube by Glenn Diesen - Oct 05, 2024 - Substack - Archive

This is not about Russia directly, but is interesting because Glenn Diesen is an academic critical of NATO expansionism.

The Geographical Pivot of History by H. J. Mackinder - The Geographical Journal Vol. 23, No. 4 (Apr., 1904), pp. 421-437 (17 pages) - The Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers) - Famous paper available on a number of sites.

The UC Interview Series: Sir Roderic Lyne Nikita Gryazin with Sir Roderic Lyne, KBE CMG, a former British diplomat who served in various positions from 1970 to 2004 - Archive

Nikita Gryazin (@NikitaGryazin) holds a Master of Philosophy degree in International Relations from the University of Oxford, where he focused on the UK’s global positioning post-Brexit, and a Bachelor’s and Master’s degree in International Relations from HSE University in Moscow. He is a native Russian speaker and fluent in English, with basic knowledge of Ukrainian, Italian, and German.

Mystery of enmity? Ian Proud, author of ‘A Misfit in Moscow: How British Diplomacy Failed in Russia’ Oksana Boyko is joined by Ian Proud, a former British diplomat and author of A Misfit in Moscow: How British diplomacy in Russia failed, 2014-2019 by Ian T. Proud (2023) - RT - Mar 3, 2024 - Archive

Inside the Russian mind by Thomas Fazi - Jul 01, 2024 - Archive

Understanding the contemporary Russian mindset and “spirit” through the work of Sergey Karaganov, one of Russia’s most influential (geo)political thinkers

Started: Tue, Mar 5, 2024

About Metagora

Greek PM's visit to Ukraine

Version 6: Sat, Dec 21, 2024

Image source: primeminister.gr

This post started as a comment on the PM visit to Ukraine in 2024 but has changed to a ongoing commentary on foreign policy and its effects on other matters. Our foreign policy is based on the doctrine “Greece belongs to the West” and as the times are changing it becomes increasingly problematic to belong to something that is becoming unhinged.

The visit

Early March 2024, the Greek PM Kyriakos Mitsotakis visited Ukraine ad met with the President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelenskyy: the official ‘breezy’ description, and reports by BBC and Le Monde, AP and AFP

Politics aside I hope the Greek PM is always “safe and sound”. He has a responsibility not just to himself and his family but also to the country that voted for him to avoid situations in which his life is in danger.

What are the Russians supposed to do, keep track of who is viiting Ukraine and stop their war efforts accordingly? It is the responsibility of whoever visits to judge whether the visit is appropriate and avoid the risk.

The visit was a great opportunity for grandstanding: “European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said in a post on social media she strongly condemned ‘the vile attack on Odessa’ during the leaders’ visit.” Two days later The Greek PM endorsed Ursula von der Leyen for a new term as President of the European Commission. Ursula von der Leyen Parliament was re-elected as Commission President on July 19.

Immediate reasons not to go to Ukraine

Suppression of political freedoms

Numerous reports on political suppression in Ukraine. Vasyl Muravytskyi’s case is indicative:

“There is no freedom of speech whatsoever in Ukraine”, says dissident journalist Vasyl Muravytskyi

Pascal Lottaz, Associate Professor for Neutrality Studies at Kyoto University’s Faculty of Law and Hakubi Center, whose YouTube channel I strongly recommend you follow, has published a fascinating video interview with a Ukrainian dissident journalist in exile, Vasyl Muravytskyi.

Muravytskyi, who had written several critical reports of the post-Euromaidan Ukrainian regime and its handling of the civil war in Ukraine, was arrested in August 2017 by Ukrainian law enforcement and charged with high treason, threatening the territorial integrity of Ukraine, inciting hatred, and even participating in a terrorist organisation. He spent 11 months in prison.

Suppression of religious freedoms

Greece needs to oppose the Ukrainian government’s persecution of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church and differentiate our foreign policy from the clearly globalist orientation of Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople and his support of the schismatic “Orthodox Church of Ukraine”:

• The West is enabling the repression of the Russian Orthodox Church and the arrest of priests in Ukraine by Sonja van den Ende (@SOTTnet @SCJournalOnline) - Fri, 10 May 2024 - Archive
• Armed men brutally beat Ukrainian Orthodox Christians and seize their church (+VIDEOS) - Lenkovtsy, Chernivtsi Province, Ukraine, February 12, 2024
• Jay Dyer on Patrick Henningsen Show - 30 May 2024- Starts at 7:30min - Jay Dyer is a TV Presenter & Author of Esoteric Hollywood

Greek minority in Ukraine

Even though Greeks have been living in the area for thousands of years successive Ukrainian governments have failed to recognize Greeks as a legitimate minority and allow the use of our language in schools.

This is important because it underlines the problem of the so called Ukrainian identity including the credible proposition that it was in part the result of Austro-Hungarian foreign policy.

Hence the PM by not raising the issue of the recognition of Greek minority contributes to a long running problem in Ukraine.

Corruption in Ukraine

There is extensive corruption in Ukraine and deserves its own blog post.

Here is what we wrote in an earlier version of this post before the US election:

The corruption involves US politicians too. That means in case of political change in the US leadership after the upcoming November 2024 elections, there bound to be substantial changes in US policy towards Ukraine.

It is in our interest not to take sides on this issue.

One of the reasons Joe Biden was defenestrated was his son’s involvement in the Burisma case. Because Biden has since pardoned his son and because of the involvement of former CIA officer Joseph Cofer Black in the Burisma board the legal case will probably not continue.

Trump has won but given his proposed candidates for various positions there is even more reason to be sceptical of US foreign policy and consider alternatives.

Towards a pragmatic foreign policy

Another name for ‘pragmatic’ is to aim for a flexible foreign policy. As Jon Henley put it:

‘West v rest’ no longer seen as template for global alliances, survey finds. Research in 21 countries suggests a growing ‘a la carte’ approach where states ‘mix and match’ partners on different issues

A good example is Italy: Italy was part of BRI until late 2023. The Italian government under pressure decided not to renew. But in July Meloni visited China

This year marks the 20th anniversary of the establishment of the comprehensive strategic partnership between China and Italy, as well as the 700th anniversary of the death of Marco Polo, a messenger of cultural exchange between East and West.

met with Xi despite western pressures.

Keep in mind that our relationship with Russia goes back centuries before there was even a US, even before America was discovered. By now [December 2024] it is clear that Russia has the upper hand in the war and has survived the western sanctions, and furthermore with China, India and other counries are working for the establishment of an alternative to the western influence.

A closer look at the Greek PM

A number of people reportedly influence the Greek PM mostly in his immediate family environment:

• Sister Dora Bakoyannis, a politician in her own right, and former mayor of Athens
• Kostas Bakoyannis, son of Dora and also former mayor of Athens
• Sia Kosioni, wife of Kostas and main eveing news presenter at SKAI News
• Wife Mareva Grabowski
• Alexis Papahelas, journalist, former member of the Trilateral Commission
• Niki Kerameus, government minister
• The Quiet American: Uknown advisor, possibly American have been mentioned in Greek media but have not been able to verify name so I borrow the title from the 1955 novel by English author Graham Greene

More information in a future version of this post.

Sources, References and Notes

(Atlantic 2024) The 2024 Global Citizen Awards: Honoring four leaders who are shaping the world ahead https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/new-atlanticist/the-2024-global-citizen-awards-honoring-four-leaders-who-are-shaping-the-world-ahead-2/ Atlantic Council - September 24, 2024 - Archive: https://archive.ph/lZXFZ

(EU Parliament 2024) Parliament re-elects Ursula von der Leyen as Commission President https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20240710IPR22812/parliament-re-elects-ursula-von-der-leyen-as-commission-president

(Fazi 2024-08) Ukrainian dissident reveals brutal censorship and repression by the Kyiv regime by Thomas Fazi - Aug 08, 2024 https://www.thomasfazi.com/p/ukrainian-dissident-reveals-brutal

(Greece PM 2024) Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis’ visit to Odessa and his meeting with the President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelenskyy - 6 March 2024 https://www.primeminister.gr/en/2024/03/06/33782

(Le Monde 2024) Zelensky and Greek prime minister’s Odesa visit rocked by a blast - Le Monde with AP and AFP - March 6, 2024 “The blast, a large explosion that the Russian military claimed as an attack on a hangar ‘in which crewless cutters were being prepared for combat use,’ was described as ‘a very intense experience’ by visiting Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis.” https://www.lemonde.fr/en/international/article/2024/03/06/zelensky-and-greece-s-prime-minister-visited-odesa-as-it-was-rocked-by-a-blast_6592568_4.html

(Wright 2024) Ukraine war: Explosions hit Odesa as Zelensky meets Greek PM, By George Wright, BBC News https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-68492688

(Global Times 2024) Meloni’s visit to China ‘timely,’ pushing China-Italy ties to a new stage: Chinese Ambassador to Italy East and West, by Zhao Yusha and Bai Yunyi - Global Times - Aug 18, 2024 - https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202408/1318223.shtml - Archive: https://archive.ph/ogWTl

Before presenting the prime minister with the award, Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla—a 2021 recipient of the Atlantic Council’s Distinguished Leadership Award—said that Mitsotakis’s impact reaches beyond Greece, throughout Europe, and across the transatlantic alliance. He praised Mitsotakis for being “a rising voice for peace and equity” globally and “a visionary champion of a new era of economic prosperity.”

(Henley 2023) Opinion: In our new world disorder, the old bipolar frames of reference won’t get us anywhere by by Jon Henley - Guardian - 15 Nov 2023 - https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/nov/14/west-v-rest-no-longer-seen-as-template-for-global-alliances-survey-finds Archive: https://archive.ph/CCKZh

(China MFA 2024) Xi Jinping Meets with Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni Ministry of Foreign Affairs, The People’s Republic of China - July 29, 2024 - https://www.mfa.gov.cn/eng/xw/zyxw/202408/t20240801_11464759.html - Archive: https://archive.ph/kjJvD

Blog Pages

File: Ukraine https://metagora.blogspot.com/2024/07/file-ukraine.html

Corruption in Ukraine https://metagora.blogspot.com/2024/03/file-corruption-in-ukraine.html

To Do:

• Section on economy and foreign policy
• former PM Tsipras visit to Ukraine in 2017
• Patelis, Samaras and ‘Lentil Patriots’
• the theology of the new Orthodox Church of Ukraine
• Mike Pompeo mingling in Greek affairs
• …

---

Started: Wed, Apr 24, 2024

About Metagora

LLM: From the River to the River

Version 1: Sat, Dec 14, 2024

Netanyahu Shows Map of ‘New Middle East’—Without Palestine—to UN General Assembly - Source: commondreams.org

Please expalin what is meant by the phrase “from the river to the river” in the context of Zionist aspirations for the future of Israel. Is this another way of describing the so called “Greater Israel”? How are the proponents of this justify it? Are biblical or other textual sources involved? Please direct me to academic sources with bibliographic information. In the current geopolitical situation how such policies are likely to play out, is it really a realistic option or purely a rhetoric stance in your view?

Note: although the phrase “from the river to the river” is different from “from the river to the sea” it is missed by some of the LLMs.

---

Mistral.AI

Explanation of “From the River to the River”

The phrase “from the river to the river” in the context of Zionist aspirations refers to the geographical extent of Israel as described in biblical texts, specifically from the Euphrates River in the east to the River of Egypt (often interpreted as the Nile or Wadi El-Arish) in the west. This concept is often associated with the idea of “Greater Israel” or “Eretz Yisrael HaShlema” (Complete Land of Israel), which envisions a much larger territory for the Jewish state than its current borders.

Relation to “Greater Israel”

Yes, “from the river to the river” is another way of describing the so-called “Greater Israel.” This concept is rooted in biblical and historical claims to the land, extending beyond the current borders of Israel to include parts of modern-day Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, and Egypt.

Justification and Textual Sources

Proponents of this idea often justify it using biblical texts and historical claims. Key biblical references include:

• Genesis 15:18-21: “On that day the Lord made a covenant with Abram and said, ‘To your descendants I give this land, from the river of Egypt to the great river, the Euphrates.’”
• Deuteronomy 1:7: “Turn you, and take your journey, and go to the mount of the Amorites, and unto all the places nigh thereunto, in the plain, in the hills, and in the vale, and in the south, and by the sea side, to the land of the Canaanites, and unto Lebanon, unto the great river, the river Euphrates.”

These texts are interpreted by some Zionists as a divine promise of a larger territory for the Jewish people.

Academic Sources

For further academic reading on this topic, you may refer to the following sources:

1. Shlomo Avineri, “The Making of Modern Zionism: The Intellectual Origins of the Jewish State” (1981)
   • This book provides a comprehensive overview of the intellectual and ideological foundations of Zionism, including the concept of “Greater Israel.”
2. Ian S. Lustick, “For the Land and the Lord: Jewish Fundamentalism in Israel” (1988)
   • Lustick examines the religious and political dimensions of Jewish fundamentalism in Israel, including the territorial aspirations associated with “Greater Israel.”
3. Gershom Gorenberg, “The Accidental Empire: Israel and the Birth of the Settlements, 1967-1977” (2006)
   • This book explores the historical context and political dynamics behind the settlement movement in Israel, which is closely tied to the idea of “Greater Israel.”

Current Geopolitical Situation

In the current geopolitical situation, the idea of “Greater Israel” is highly contentious and largely viewed as unrealistic. Several factors contribute to this assessment:

1. International Opposition: The international community, including key allies of Israel such as the United States and European countries, generally opposes any unilateral expansion of Israeli territory beyond its recognized borders.

2. Palestinian Conflict: The ongoing Israeli-Palestinian conflict makes any significant territorial expansion highly problematic and likely to exacerbate tensions and violence.

3. Regional Stability: Expanding Israeli territory into neighboring countries would destabilize the region, potentially leading to military conflicts and further diplomatic isolation for Israel.

4. Domestic Politics: Within Israel, there is a diverse range of opinions on the matter, with many Israelis and political parties advocating for a two-state solution or other forms of compromise rather than territorial expansion.

Realistic Option or Rhetoric?

Given the complexities and challenges outlined above, the idea of “Greater Israel” is more of a rhetorical stance than a realistic policy option. While it holds symbolic and ideological significance for some Zionists, the practical implementation of such a vision faces insurmountable obstacles in the current geopolitical landscape.

For a more nuanced understanding, it is essential to consider the evolving political dynamics, both within Israel and internationally, as well as the ongoing efforts towards peace and stability in the region.

---

Claude.AI

I’ll provide a comprehensive analysis of the phrase “from the river to the sea” in the context of Zionist territorial aspirations.

Phrase Origin and Meaning

The phrase “from the river to the sea” (מהנהר עד הים, “min ha-nahar ad ha-yam”) refers to the geographic area between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea. This territory encompasses:

• The current state of Israel
• The West Bank
• Gaza Strip

Historical and Political Contexts

Zionist Interpretation

In Zionist discourse, this phrase represents different interpretations:

1. Maximalist Territorial Vision
   • Suggests Jewish sovereignty over the entire land between the Jordan River and Mediterranean Sea
   • Rooted in biblical land claims and historical Jewish presence
   • Overlaps with concept of “Greater Israel”
2. Political Rhetoric
   • Used by different political factions with varying meanings
   • Right-wing groups often use it to justify settlement expansion
   • Some interpret it as a call for complete territorial control

Biblical and Historical Justifications

Proponents typically cite: - Biblical promises to Abraham (Genesis 15:18-21) - Historical Jewish presence in the region - Archaeological evidence of ancient Jewish kingdoms - Interpretations of historical land ownership

Academic Sources

Some scholarly references for further reading:

1. Gershon Gorenberg
   • The Accidental Empire: Israel and the Birth of the Settlements, 1967-1977
   • Provides nuanced analysis of territorial expansion
2. Benny Morris
   • Righteous Victims: A History of the Zionist-Arab Conflict, 1881-2001
   • Offers comprehensive historical perspective
3. Daniel Bnor
   • Palestineʼs Horizon: Toward a Just Peace
   • Critical examination of territorial claims

Contemporary Geopolitical Realism

Challenges to Full Implementation

• International legal constraints
• Palestinian population demographics
• Global diplomatic pressures
• Economic sustainability
• Security complexities

Current Assessment

While the phrase remains powerful rhetoric, complete territorial control seems increasingly unrealistic due to: - Two-state solution momentum - International diplomatic pressures - Economic and demographic challenges - Ongoing Israeli-Palestinian conflict dynamics

Nuanced Perspective

The phrase represents more than a literal geographical claim—it’s a complex symbolic statement embodying: - Historical narratives - Political aspirations - Competing national identities - Ongoing territorial dispute

Disclaimer: This analysis represents an academic, neutral examination of a complex geopolitical issue. The interpretation varies significantly across different political and ideological perspectives.

Recommended Further Reading

1. Scholarly Journals:
   • Journal of Palestine Studies
   • Middle East Journal
   • Israel Studies
2. Academic Databases:
   • JSTOR
   • ProQuest Middle East Database

Note: Interpretations of this phrase are deeply contested and politically sensitive. Scholarly sources provide the most nuanced understanding.

---

Gemini

The phrase “from the river to the sea” has different meanings depending on who uses it.

Pro-Palestinian Interpretation:

• A Single Democratic State: For many Palestinians, “from the river to the sea” signifies a vision of a binational, secular, and democratic state encompassing the entire territory between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea. This would include the current state of Israel, the West Bank, and the Gaza Strip.
• Rejection of a Two-State Solution: This vision rejects the current framework of a two-state solution with a Jewish state alongside a Palestinian state.

Pro-Israel Interpretation:

• Israeli Sovereignty: Some right-wing Israelis interpret the phrase as asserting Israeli sovereignty over the entire territory between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea. This aligns with the concept of “Greater Israel,” which encompasses the West Bank and Gaza Strip in addition to the current state of Israel.
• Biblical Justification: Proponents often cite biblical texts, such as the promise of the land of Israel to the Jewish people, to justify their claims.

Academic Sources:

• “The Idea of a Greater Israel” by Avi Shlaim: This book explores the historical and ideological roots of the Greater Israel concept.
• “The Invention of the Land of Israel: From Holy Land to Homeland” by David Kushner: This book examines the historical and religious narratives surrounding the concept of the land of Israel.

Geopolitical Reality:

The “from the river to the sea” vision, in either interpretation, faces significant challenges in the current geopolitical landscape. The deep-seated conflict between Israelis and Palestinians, coupled with international pressure for a two-state solution, makes it a highly contentious and unlikely outcome in the near future.

Disclaimer: This information is for educational purposes only and does not reflect personal opinions or biases.

---

ChatGPT

Understanding the Phrase “From the River to the River”

The phrase “from the river to the river” is often interpreted as a reference to the land between the Nile River in Egypt and the Euphrates River, sometimes cited in Zionist discourse to describe aspirations for an expanded territorial vision of Israel. This phrase is sometimes linked to the concept of “Greater Israel,” a notion derived from biblical and historical references, though its modern political usage varies significantly.

---

Biblical and Historical Context

1. Biblical Origins:
   The idea of territory “from the river to the river” is rooted in certain biblical texts, such as:
   • Genesis 15:18: God promises Abraham that his descendants will inherit the land “from the river of Egypt to the great river, the Euphrates.”
   • Exodus 23:31: A similar delineation is mentioned as the borders of the land promised to the Israelites.
2. Historical Interpretations:
   While these texts provide a religious foundation, their interpretation has been subject to debate. Some see these verses as a spiritual metaphor, while others regard them as a territorial promise.

---

Modern Political Context

1. Greater Israel and Zionism:
   The idea of “Greater Israel” is often associated with early Zionist writings and aspirations. While mainstream Zionism focused on establishing a state within more limited boundaries (e.g., the Balfour Declaration and the United Nations partition plan of 1947), fringe groups and ideologues have occasionally invoked the “from the river to the river” concept to justify broader territorial claims.

2. Justifications and Arguments:
   Proponents may justify these claims using:

   • Religious texts: Emphasizing biblical promises.
   • Historical claims: Highlighting ancient Jewish presence in the broader region.
   • Security concerns: Arguing for expanded borders as a means of ensuring Israel’s safety.

3. Realistic Application:
   In practice, the phrase has limited traction in mainstream Israeli policy, where most political discourse is centered on more pragmatic territorial considerations (e.g., the borders with Palestine, Lebanon, and Syria).

---

Academic Sources and References

1. Biblical Studies and Zionism:
   • Kimmerling, Baruch, and Joel S. Migdal. Palestinians: The Making of a People. Harvard University Press, 1993.
   • Sand, Shlomo. The Invention of the Land of Israel: From Holy Land to Homeland. Verso Books, 2012.
2. Geopolitical Analysis:
   • Lustick, Ian. For the Land and the Lord: Jewish Fundamentalism in Israel. Council on Foreign Relations, 1988.
   • Tessler, Mark. A History of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict. Indiana University Press, 1994.
3. Contemporary Policy:
   • Smith, Charles D. Palestine and the Arab-Israeli Conflict: A History with Documents. Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2020.

---

Realism vs. Rhetoric in Modern Context

1. Current Geopolitical Realities:
   • International pressure, regional diplomacy, and internal political considerations make expansive territorial claims highly impractical.
   • Peace agreements (e.g., Camp David Accords) and ongoing negotiations with Palestinians and neighboring states focus on achieving workable borders rather than expansive historical claims.
2. Rhetoric vs. Policy:
   • For most mainstream Israeli leaders, “from the river to the river” is rhetoric rather than actionable policy. It is more often invoked by religious-nationalist groups and individuals with ideological motives.
3. Future Implications:
   • With the shifting dynamics in the Middle East (e.g., normalization agreements like the Abraham Accords), policies grounded in pragmatism are more likely to shape Israel’s future than maximalist territorial aspirations.

---

Conclusion

While “from the river to the river” has biblical and ideological resonance, it is not a realistic policy goal in the current geopolitical context. Its use is primarily rhetorical, often serving as a rallying cry for specific ideological groups rather than a blueprint for national strategy. For further academic exploration, consult the referenced works to understand the historical, theological, and political nuances of this concept.

---

Started: Sat, Dec 14, 2024

About Metagora

LLM: Attack, Anchoring and Gaslighting

Version 1: Sat, Dec 7, 2024

Public Domain, Link

Attack on Pearl Harbor: USS Nevada passing seaplane ramp prior to first grounding NARA 80-G-32894 - Wikimedia.

Imaginary situation in international relations: there is an attack on country A that is attributed on country B because the two coutries are in confict. Please compare and contrast the following two scenarios and their follow ups:

• Scenario one: the attack was a false flag organized by A on itself
• Scenario two: A knew of the incoming attack but let it happen

Either way, there are many victims as a result of the attack creating emotinal support for A and ‘anchoring’ on which A can start a process of ‘gaslighting’ the international community.

Please comment and speculate, and direct me to academic sources with bibliographic information.

---

Mistral.AI

Scenario One: False Flag Operation

Description

In this scenario, Country A organizes a false flag attack on itself, attributing the blame to Country B. The goal is to garner emotional support from the international community and justify aggressive actions against Country B.

Follow-Ups

1. Immediate Reactions:
   • Domestic: Country A’s citizens rally behind their government, driven by patriotism and a sense of victimhood.
   • International: Other nations express sympathy and support for Country A, potentially leading to diplomatic or military actions against Country B.
2. Long-Term Consequences:
   • Escalation: The conflict between Country A and Country B intensifies, possibly leading to full-scale war.
   • International Relations: Country A may gain short-term support but risks long-term damage to its credibility if the truth is revealed.
   • Humanitarian Impact: The victims of the attack suffer, and the emotional trauma is used to fuel further conflict.

Scenario Two: Deliberate Inaction

Description

In this scenario, Country A is aware of an impending attack but chooses not to prevent it, allowing the attack to occur and attributing blame to Country B. The goal is similar to the first scenario: to gain emotional support and justify actions against Country B.

Follow-Ups

1. Immediate Reactions:
   • Domestic: Similar to the first scenario, citizens of Country A rally behind their government.
   • International: Sympathy and support pour in from the international community, with potential actions against Country B.
2. Long-Term Consequences:
   • Escalation: The conflict escalates, with Country A using the attack as a pretext for further actions.
   • International Relations: Country A’s credibility may be questioned if it becomes known that they allowed the attack to happen.
   • Humanitarian Impact: Victims suffer, and the emotional trauma is exploited for political gain.

Comparison and Contrast

Similarities

• Emotional Manipulation: Both scenarios involve manipulating emotions to gain support.
• Victimization: Both result in significant loss of life and emotional trauma.
• Escalation: Both scenarios lead to an escalation of conflict between Country A and Country B.

Differences

• Intent: In the first scenario, Country A actively plans and executes the attack. In the second, Country A passively allows the attack to happen.
• Risk of Exposure: The first scenario carries a higher risk of exposure and backlash if the false flag operation is discovered. The second scenario may be harder to prove, as inaction is more difficult to trace.
• Moral Implications: The first scenario involves direct deception and harm to its own citizens, while the second involves negligence and indirect harm.

Academic Sources

False Flag Operations

1. Book: “False Flags: Template for Terror” by Ole Dammegard
   • Bibliographic Information: Dammegard, O. (2015). False Flags: Template for Terror. Lightning Source Inc.
   • Summary: This book explores the concept of false flag operations and their historical context, providing insights into how such operations are planned and executed.
2. Journal Article: “The Politics of False Flag Terrorism” by David Ray Griffin
   • Bibliographic Information: Griffin, D. R. (2008). The Politics of False Flag Terrorism. Global Research.
   • Summary: This article discusses the political motivations behind false flag operations and their impact on international relations.

Deliberate Inaction

1. Book: “The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism” by Naomi Klein
   • Bibliographic Information: Klein, N. (2007). The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism. Metropolitan Books.
   • Summary: While not directly about deliberate inaction, this book explores how crises are exploited for political and economic gain, providing a relevant framework for understanding the second scenario.
2. Journal Article: “The Strategic Use of Emotions in International Relations” by Jonathan Mercer
   • Bibliographic Information: Mercer, J. (2010). The Strategic Use of Emotions in International Relations. International Organization, 64(1), 1-36.
   • Summary: This article discusses how emotions are strategically used in international relations, which is relevant to both scenarios where emotional manipulation is a key factor.

Conclusion

Both scenarios involve complex ethical and strategic considerations. The first scenario is more directly deceptive and carries higher risks, while the second is more passive but still morally questionable. Understanding these dynamics requires a nuanced view of international relations, emotional manipulation, and the long-term consequences of such actions.

---

Claude.AI

I’ll analyze these scenarios through the lens of international relations theory and strategic conflict escalation. I’ll provide a structured markdown response that explores the geopolitical dynamics and potential implications.

Scenario One: False Flag Attack

Strategic Characteristics

• Deliberate self-inflicted harm designed to:
  • Manipulate international sympathy
  • Justify retaliatory actions
  • Create a narrative of victimhood
• Requires sophisticated planning and psychological operations (PSYOPS)
• High risk of exposure could lead to significant diplomatic backlash

Potential Motivations

• Generating international political leverage
• Justifying military intervention
• Shifting domestic and international public opinion
• Creating pretext for territorial expansion or regime change

Scenario Two: Intentional Vulnerability

Strategic Characteristics

• Calculated passive complicity
• Allows attack to occur while maintaining plausible deniability
• Creates emotional and political momentum for subsequent actions
• Less direct risk of immediate exposure compared to false flag operation

Potential Motivations

• Provoking an international response
• Generating moral high ground
• Creating justification for pre-planned military or diplomatic actions

Comparative Analysis

Psychological Warfare Dimensions

• Both scenarios leverage emotional anchoring
• Exploit international sympathy mechanisms
• Create narrative control through victimhood positioning

Risk Calculation

• False Flag: Higher operational complexity
• Intentional Vulnerability: Lower immediate operational risk
• Both require sophisticated information management

International Law Implications

• Potential violations of:
  • UN Charter principles
  • International humanitarian law
  • Principles of state responsibility

Academic References

Recommended Scholarly Sources

1. Reiter, D. (2003). “Exploring the Onset of Preventive War: A Rational Choice Theory Approach.” International Interactions, 29(4), 385-409.
   • Analyzes strategic decision-making in conflict initiation
2. Jervis, R. (1976). Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton University Press.
   • Seminal work on psychological dimensions of international conflict
3. Betts, R. K. (2002). Surprise Attack: Lessons for Defense Planning. Brookings Institution Press.
   • Examines strategic deception and vulnerability in international relations
4. Schelling, T. C. (1966). Arms and Influence. Yale University Press.
   • Classic text on strategic interaction and signaling in conflicts

Theoretical Frameworks

• Constructivist International Relations Theory
• Rationalist Conflict Escalation Models
• Psychological Strategic Studies

Critical Observations

• These scenarios represent extreme manifestations of strategic manipulation
• Highlight the complex psychological dimensions of international conflicts
• Demonstrate how narrative control can be as crucial as military capabilities

Caveat: The scenarios described are hypothetical and should be understood as theoretical explorations of strategic interaction, not endorsements of such actions.

---

Gemini

Scenario One: False Flag Attack

• Execution: Country A orchestrates an attack on itself, making it appear as though it originated from Country B. This could involve staging the attack, manipulating evidence, or using proxies to carry it out.
• Emotional Impact: The attack, regardless of its origin, causes significant casualties and suffering within Country A. This generates widespread sympathy and outrage, uniting the population and galvanizing international support.
• “Gaslighting” the International Community: Country A leverages the emotional outpouring and the apparent aggression from Country B to:
  • Justify pre-existing grievances: The attack provides a concrete justification for actions Country A may have already been considering, such as increased military spending, stricter security measures, or even military retaliation.
  • Shift international blame: By framing Country B as the aggressor, Country A can deflect attention from any potential internal issues or destabilizing factors.
  • Manipulate public opinion: A sustained campaign of propaganda and misinformation can reinforce the narrative of victimhood and aggression, making it difficult for the international community to question Country A’s claims.

Scenario Two: Knowing of the Attack but Allowing it to Happen

• Execution: Country A possesses intelligence indicating an imminent attack from Country B but chooses not to act, either due to strategic calculations, political considerations, or a desire to exploit the situation.
• Emotional Impact: The attack still results in significant casualties and suffering within Country A, generating similar emotional responses as in Scenario One.
• “Gaslighting” the International Community: Country A can still utilize the attack to its advantage:
  • Justify pre-existing grievances: Similar to Scenario One, the attack provides a powerful justification for actions Country A may have been considering.
  • Shift international blame: While technically not the direct perpetrator, Country A can argue that it was a victim of aggression and that its inaction was a result of unforeseen circumstances or a deliberate attempt to avoid escalation.
  • Manipulate public opinion: Country A can portray itself as a responsible actor who tried to prevent the attack but was ultimately powerless to stop it, further solidifying its victimhood narrative.

Key Differences

• Agency: In Scenario One, Country A is the direct perpetrator of the attack, whereas in Scenario Two, it is a passive actor, albeit one that knowingly allowed the attack to occur.
• Moral Implications: Scenario One involves a more direct and morally questionable act of deception, while Scenario Two, while still ethically problematic, may be seen as a less egregious violation of international norms.
• Legal Ramifications: While both scenarios could have legal consequences, the evidence required to prove a false flag operation is likely to be more substantial and difficult to obtain than demonstrating that a country had prior knowledge of an attack.

Academic Sources

• False Flag Operations:
  • “False Flag Operations: A Historical Perspective” by David A. Hoffman (journal article)
  • “The Politics of Fear: How Terrorism and Security Concerns Have Shaped American Democracy” by Martha Crenshaw (book)
• Information Warfare and Propaganda:
  • “Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media” by Noam Chomsky and Edward S. Herman (book)
  • “Propaganda and Persuasion: A Historical Encyclopedia, 1500 to the Present” edited by Stanley J. Baran (book)

Disclaimer: This analysis is purely hypothetical and does not reflect any real-world events or actors. It is intended to explore the potential consequences of different actions in an international conflict scenario.

---

ChatGPT

Comparative Analysis of the Scenarios

Scenario One: The Attack was a False Flag Organized by A

• Nature of the Event:
  In this scenario, country A orchestrates the attack on its own soil to create the appearance of aggression by country B. This false flag operation involves direct planning and execution by country A to manipulate perceptions intentionally.

• Political Implications:

  • A gains international sympathy and support as the “victim” of unprovoked aggression.
  • The international community may be more inclined to support punitive measures against B, such as sanctions, isolation, or military intervention.
  • If the false flag operation is exposed, A risks severe damage to its credibility, losing trust not only from its citizens but also from the global community.

• Ethical and Legal Dimensions:
  A’s actions are unethical and possibly criminal, involving deception and the deliberate harm of its own people to achieve political ends.

• Risks and Long-term Consequences:

  • If discovered, the fallout could lead to A being ostracized internationally and internally destabilized.
  • It might set a precedent for other states or actors to use similar tactics, eroding trust in international relations.

Scenario Two: A Knew of the Incoming Attack but Let it Happen

• Nature of the Event:
  In this scenario, country A had prior knowledge of an attack planned by B but chose not to intervene. The intent is to allow the attack to occur to leverage the resultant victimhood for political or strategic purposes.

• Political Implications:

  • A still gains sympathy as the victim of aggression, just like in Scenario One.
  • The moral high ground may be easier to maintain since A did not directly orchestrate the attack.
  • However, if A’s foreknowledge is revealed, it risks being accused of negligence or cynical exploitation of its own citizens.

• Ethical and Legal Dimensions:

  • While less overtly criminal than a false flag, allowing harm to one’s citizens for political gain is ethically indefensible.
  • A’s leaders might face accusations of dereliction of duty or complicity in the attack.

• Risks and Long-term Consequences:

  • Discovery of prior knowledge could lead to domestic and international backlash, though the consequences may be less severe than in Scenario One.
  • It could lead to calls for greater transparency and accountability in governance.

---

Similarities Between the Scenarios

• Both scenarios involve manipulating victimhood to gain international sympathy and support.
• Both risk significant fallout if the truth is discovered, including loss of credibility and potential domestic unrest.
• Both scenarios are ethically questionable and involve a disregard for human life for political ends.

---

Differences Between the Scenarios

Aspect	Scenario One (False Flag)	Scenario Two (Letting it Happen)
Direct Responsibility	A is directly responsible for the attack.	A is indirectly responsible through inaction.
Risk of Exposure	Greater, as the operation involves active deception.	Lower, but still significant if foreknowledge is revealed.
Ethical Gravity	More severe due to deliberate orchestration.	Less severe but still unethical.
Strategic Justification	May offer more immediate and unquestionable “evidence” of B’s aggression.	Relies on B’s genuine aggression for legitimacy.

---

Speculative Outcomes

1. Gaslighting the International Community:
   Both scenarios allow A to “anchor” its narrative of victimhood, presenting itself as the aggrieved party. A might use this emotional leverage to:
   • Rally allies for military or diplomatic actions.
   • Frame B as a global threat, shifting focus from A’s own actions or policies.
   • Undermine any scrutiny by labeling dissenting voices as insensitive to the victims.
2. Emotional Manipulation:
   By focusing on the human cost of the attack, A can deflect questions about the truth of the event, portraying skepticism as disrespectful to the victims.

---

Academic Sources for Further Study

1. False Flags and Deception in International Relations:
   • Andrew, Christopher. The Secret World: A History of Intelligence. Yale University Press, 2018.
     
   • Bennett, W. Lance, and Steven Livingston. “The Logic of Sabotage in Conflict Narratives.” Political Communication, vol. 24, no. 1, 2007, pp. 67-88.
2. Ethics and State Responsibility:
   • Walzer, Michael. Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations. Basic Books, 2015.
     
   • Orend, Brian. The Morality of War. Broadview Press, 2013.
3. Psychological Manipulation in International Relations:
   • Nye, Joseph S. Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. PublicAffairs, 2004.
     
   • Herman, Edward S., and Noam Chomsky. Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. Pantheon Books, 1988.
4. Propaganda and Gaslighting in Conflict:
   • O’Shaughnessy, Nicholas J. Politics and Propaganda: Weapons of Mass Seduction. Manchester University Press, 2004.
     
   • Carruthers, Susan L. The Media at War: Communication and Conflict in the Twentieth Century. Macmillan International Higher Education, 2011.

These works explore the theoretical, ethical, and practical implications of state actions and manipulations during conflicts.

---

Started:

About Metagora

LLM: Tunnel Vision and Blind Spot

Please explain, compare and contrast ‘tunnel vision’ and ‘blind spot’. In a simplistic sense ‘tunnel vision’ is seeing one thing and missing everything else while ‘blind spot’ is seeing everything but missing one thing. In a way they are opposites. Is there anything to this comment beyond word play? Please direct me to academic sources with bibliographic information. Failing that please speculate.

---

Mistral.AI

Comparison and Contrast of ‘Tunnel Vision’ and ‘Blind Spot’

The terms ‘tunnel vision’ and ‘blind spot’ are often used metaphorically to describe different types of perceptual or cognitive limitations. While they share some similarities, they also have distinct differences. Below is an explanation, comparison, and contrast of these two concepts, along with references to academic sources where available.

Definitions

Tunnel Vision

• Definition: Tunnel vision refers to a narrow focus on a single aspect or perspective, to the exclusion of other relevant information or viewpoints. It is often associated with a lack of peripheral awareness.
• Metaphorical Use: In cognitive and organizational contexts, tunnel vision can lead to a failure to consider alternative solutions or potential risks.

Blind Spot

• Definition: A blind spot refers to an area where perception or awareness is lacking or obscured. In a cognitive context, it represents a specific aspect or piece of information that is consistently overlooked or ignored.
• Metaphorical Use: Blind spots can lead to biased decision-making or a failure to recognize important factors that could influence outcomes.

Comparison and Contrast

Similarities

1. Perceptual Limitations: Both concepts involve limitations in perception or awareness.
2. Cognitive Biases: Both can be influenced by cognitive biases and heuristics that affect how information is processed.
3. Impact on Decision-Making: Both tunnel vision and blind spots can lead to suboptimal decision-making by failing to consider all relevant information.

Differences

1. Scope of Focus:
   • Tunnel Vision: Involves a narrow focus on a single aspect, excluding other relevant information.
   • Blind Spot: Involves a specific area or piece of information that is consistently overlooked, despite a broader focus.
2. Awareness:
   • Tunnel Vision: Individuals may be aware of their narrow focus but choose to ignore other information.
   • Blind Spot: Individuals are typically unaware of their blind spots, making them more insidious.
3. Contextual Factors:
   • Tunnel Vision: Often arises from situational factors such as stress, time pressure, or strong emotional states.
   • Blind Spot: More likely to be a result of deeply ingrained cognitive biases or cultural conditioning.

Academic Sources

Tunnel Vision

• Source: Janis, I. L., & Mann, L. (1977). Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment. Free Press.
  • Summary: This book discusses the concept of tunnel vision in the context of decision-making, particularly under stressful conditions.
• Source: Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
  • Summary: Kahneman explores how cognitive biases, including tunnel vision, can affect decision-making processes.

Blind Spot

• Source: Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2013). Blindspot: Hidden Biases of Good People. Delacorte Press.
  • Summary: This book delves into the concept of blind spots, particularly in the context of implicit biases and how they influence behavior and decision-making.
• Source: Bazerman, M. H., & Chugh, D. (2005). Decisions Without Blinders. Harvard Business Review, 83(1), 88-95.
  • Summary: This article discusses the impact of blind spots on organizational decision-making and provides strategies for overcoming them.

Speculative Analysis

In the absence of direct academic sources comparing these two concepts, it is reasonable to speculate that: - Tunnel Vision is more likely to be a temporary state influenced by situational factors, while Blind Spots are more enduring and rooted in cognitive biases. - Tunnel Vision can be mitigated through conscious efforts to broaden one’s perspective, whereas Blind Spots require more systematic interventions, such as training and feedback, to become aware of and address.

These concepts are interrelated but distinct, and understanding their nuances can help in developing strategies to improve decision-making and awareness in various contexts.

---

Claude.AI

Your observation about ‘tunnel vision’ and ‘blind spot’ is an interesting starting point for discussion. Let’s explore these concepts in more depth:

Tunnel Vision

Tunnel vision refers to a loss of peripheral vision, resulting in a constricted circular field of view. This can be literal (in medical contexts) or metaphorical (in cognitive or behavioral contexts).

• Medical: A condition where peripheral vision is lost, leaving only central vision intact.
• Cognitive/Behavioral: A tendency to focus on a single aspect of a situation while ignoring the broader context or alternative perspectives.

Blind Spot

A blind spot is an area where a person’s view is obstructed or where perception is absent.

• Visual: The point in the visual field that corresponds to the lack of light-detecting photoreceptor cells on the optic disc of the retina.
• Cognitive: An area where a person fails to exercise judgment or lacks awareness, often about personal traits or behaviors.

Comparison and Contrast

Your initial observation captures some truth:

1. Focus vs. Omission: Tunnel vision indeed involves intense focus on one area at the expense of others, while a blind spot is a specific omission in an otherwise complete field of view or understanding.

2. Scope: Tunnel vision affects a large portion of the perceptual or cognitive field, whereas a blind spot is typically more localized.

3. Awareness: People with tunnel vision are often aware of their limited perspective, while blind spots are typically unconscious.

4. Intentionality: Tunnel vision can sometimes be intentional (e.g., focusing intently on a task), while blind spots are almost always unintentional.

While there isn’t a direct academic source comparing these concepts in the way you’ve framed them, we can draw some connections to existing research:

Relevant Academic Concepts

1. Attentional Focus: Research in cognitive psychology explores how attention can be narrowly focused (similar to tunnel vision) or broadly distributed.

2. Cognitive Biases: The study of cognitive biases in psychology includes concepts like confirmation bias, which can lead to a form of tunnel vision, and blind spots in decision-making.

3. Situational Awareness: In fields like aviation and emergency response, both tunnel vision and blind spots are considered threats to maintaining proper situational awareness.

While I don’t have access to specific academic sources, researchers interested in these topics might look into journals of cognitive psychology, decision science, or human factors for more in-depth studies.

Speculation

The metaphorical uses of ‘tunnel vision’ and ‘blind spot’ in cognitive and behavioral contexts might indeed be seen as complementary or even opposite phenomena:

1. Information Processing: Tunnel vision involves over-processing of specific information while under-processing peripheral data. Blind spots involve normal processing of most information but a complete lack of processing in specific areas.

2. Adaptability: Both can be adaptive or maladaptive depending on the context. Tunnel vision can aid in focusing on crucial tasks, while blind spots can help filter out irrelevant information. However, both can also lead to errors or missed opportunities.

3. Intervention Strategies: Addressing tunnel vision often involves broadening perspective, while addressing blind spots requires pinpointing and illuminating specific oversights.

4. Systemic Impact: In organizational settings, tunnel vision might lead to missed opportunities or lack of innovation, while blind spots could result in recurring mistakes or overlooked risks.

In conclusion, while your initial observation might seem like wordplay, it does highlight meaningful differences in how these two phenomena affect perception, cognition, and behavior. Further research into attention, bias, and decision-making could provide more rigorous insights into the relationship between these concepts.

---

Gemini

Tunnel Vision vs. Blind Spot: A Comparative Analysis

While the simplistic understanding of “tunnel vision” as seeing one thing and missing everything else and “blind spot” as seeing everything but missing one thing is somewhat accurate, there are nuances and complexities to these concepts that warrant further exploration.

Tunnel Vision

• Definition: Tunnel vision refers to a narrow-focused perspective that limits one’s ability to consider alternative viewpoints or possibilities. It involves a fixation on a particular goal, idea, or belief, often to the exclusion of other relevant information.
• Characteristics:
  • Selective perception: Focusing on specific details while ignoring others.
  • Resistance to change: Difficulty in adapting to new information or perspectives.
  • Limited creativity: Inability to think outside the box or explore alternative solutions.

Blind Spot

• Definition: A blind spot is a gap in one’s awareness or understanding of a particular issue or situation. It refers to a cognitive bias that prevents individuals from perceiving or acknowledging certain information or perspectives.
• Characteristics:
  • Unconscious bias: Prejudices or stereotypes that influence perception.
  • Confirmation bias: Tendency to seek out information that confirms existing beliefs.
  • Groupthink: Pressure to conform to the opinions of a group, leading to a lack of critical thinking.

Comparison and Contrast

Feature	Tunnel Vision	Blind Spot
Focus	Narrow and limited	Broad but missing a specific element
Awareness	Overly focused on one aspect	Lack of awareness of a particular issue
Cognitive bias	Selective perception	Confirmation bias and groupthink

Beyond Word Play:

While the initial comparison of tunnel vision and blind spot as opposites may seem simplistic, there are deeper connections between these concepts. Both involve cognitive biases that can hinder effective decision-making and problem-solving. Tunnel vision can lead to blind spots by limiting one’s perspective and preventing the consideration of alternative viewpoints. Conversely, blind spots can contribute to tunnel vision by creating a narrow focus on a particular issue or perspective.

Academic Sources:

1. Kahneman, D. (2011). Think fast, slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
2. Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D., & Akert, R. M. (2011). Social psychology (8th ed.). Pearson Education.
3. Bazerman, M. H., & Moore, D. A. (2013). Judgment in managerial decision making (7th ed.). Wiley.

These sources provide in-depth discussions of cognitive biases, including tunnel vision and blind spots, and their implications for decision-making and problem-solving.

---

ChatGPT

Tunnel Vision vs. Blind Spot: A Comparison

Tunnel Vision and Blind Spot are terms that are often used metaphorically to describe limitations in perception or understanding. While they might appear to be opposites, the relationship between them is more nuanced. Here’s a detailed explanation and comparison of these concepts:

Definitions

• Tunnel Vision:
  • In a literal sense, tunnel vision refers to the loss of peripheral vision, resulting in a narrow field of view, where the person can see only what is directly in front of them.
  • Metaphorically, it refers to focusing narrowly on one aspect of a situation or problem while ignoring other relevant factors. This can lead to a one-dimensional perspective, often missing the broader context or alternative viewpoints.
• Blind Spot:
  • Literally, a blind spot refers to an area in the visual field where a person cannot see because the corresponding part of the retina lacks photoreceptors.
  • Metaphorically, it describes an area of ignorance or a particular aspect that a person fails to recognize, even when they are otherwise aware of the broader situation. This can be due to biases, lack of knowledge, or oversight.

Comparison and Contrast

• Scope of Perception:
  • Tunnel Vision: Characterized by a restricted focus, it emphasizes a single aspect to the exclusion of all others. It’s a form of concentrated attention, but at the cost of missing peripheral or contextual elements.
  • Blind Spot: Represents a missing piece within an otherwise comprehensive view. The person may be broadly aware but has a specific gap in understanding or perception.
• Oppositional Nature:
  • Your observation that tunnel vision is “seeing one thing and missing everything else,” while a blind spot is “seeing everything but missing one thing” is insightful. They can indeed be seen as opposites in how they describe perceptual limitations:
    • Tunnel Vision misses the whole context due to over-focus.
    • Blind Spot misses a specific part within a broader context.
• Cognitive Implications:
  • Tunnel Vision can result in decision-making that is overly simplistic, lacking in depth, and potentially misguided due to ignoring relevant data or alternative perspectives.
  • Blind Spot can lead to errors of omission where critical information or perspectives are overlooked, which can be just as damaging as the narrow focus of tunnel vision.

Speculative Analysis Beyond Word Play

The idea that tunnel vision and blind spot are opposites is not just wordplay but speaks to different types of cognitive biases and limitations:

• Cognitive Biases:
  • Tunnel Vision is akin to confirmation bias, where a person only seeks information that supports their preconceived notions and disregards everything else.
  • Blind Spot could be related to the Dunning-Kruger effect, where one fails to recognize one’s own deficiencies, or inattentional blindness, where one is focused on certain elements but misses others.
• Practical Implications:
  • In critical thinking, tunnel vision might lead to a failure in exploring multiple hypotheses or solutions, whereas a blind spot could mean missing critical flaws or risks within an otherwise well-rounded analysis.

Academic Sources

While specific academic comparisons of “tunnel vision” and “blind spot” in the exact terms described above are sparse, related discussions on cognitive biases and perceptual limitations can be found in the following sources:

1. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
   • Kahneman discusses various cognitive biases and how they affect decision-making. Concepts related to tunnel vision (focusing narrowly) and blind spots (missing specific aspects) are explored within the broader framework of cognitive errors.
   • Link to book
2. Simons, D. J., & Chabris, C. F. (1999). Gorillas in our midst: sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception, 28(9), 1059-1074.
   • This study on inattentional blindness demonstrates how people can completely miss unexpected objects or events while focusing on something else, highlighting a form of blind spot.
   • Link to article
3. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124-1131.
   • This seminal paper discusses various cognitive biases, including those that relate to narrow focus (tunnel vision) and missing critical pieces of information (blind spots).
   • Link to article

These sources provide a foundation for understanding the broader cognitive and perceptual implications of tunnel vision and blind spots, offering insights into how these concepts manifest in human behavior and decision-making.

---

Started: Sat, Sep 7, 2024

About Metagora