Saturday, February 15, 2025

File: Syria in Transition

Version 2: Sat, Feb 15, 2025

Syria (orthographic projection) disputed.svg
By Serafart - Own work based on: Syria (orthographic projection).svgSource for showing Alexandretta as being claimed by Syria: (1956). “The Sanjak of Alexandretta (Hatay): Its Impact on Turkish-Syrian Relations (1939-1956)”. The Middle East Journal 10 (4): 379-394., CC BY-SA 4.0, Link

Map of Syria with disputed territories highlighted in light green - Wikimedia

The plan for the following is to have a series of topics and then the sources and notes:

Prison Releases

Bucca Prison - Iraq

North Syria - 2024

North Syria - future

Sources and Comments

Special section on James Corbett:

Anderson, Tim (2015) “The Dirty War On Syria: Chemical Fabrications, The East Ghouta Incident” - Prof. Tim Anderson is with the Centre for Counter Hegemonic Studies - Global Research, December 12, 2015 http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-dirty-war-on-syria-chemical-fabrications-the-east-ghouta-incident/5493698 - Archive: https://archive.ph/iDKIw

al-Assad, Bashar (2025) “Statement by President Bashar al-Assad on the Circumstances Leading to His Departure from Syria” - Global Research, December 17, 2024 https://www.globalresearch.ca/bashar-al-assad-circumstances-leading-departure-syria/5875200 - Archive: https://archive.ph/RyFrr

Chulov, Martin - “Largest of America’s two prisons in Iraq to shut” https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/sep/16/us-prison-iraq-bucca-closure - The Guardian - 17 Sep 2009

The largest of America’s two prisons in Iraq, Camp Bucca, will close by the weekend as the US military winds down the highly contentious detention programme it has run for the last six years. From next week only one US-run facility – Camp Cropper near Baghdad airport – will still be operating. That too is expected to close by the end of the year, leaving only 1,000 allegedly “hardcore” detainees in joint US and Iraqi hands.

At its peak Camp Bucca held about 26,000 inmates, many of whom were thought to be Islamic extremists and factional leaders in the sectarian war that ravaged Iraq in 2006 and 2007. The sprawling desert compound, near the port of Umm Qasr in southern Iraq, was described by prisoners as harsh.

Corbett, James (2013) - “Interview 738 – Sharmine Narwani on the Geopolitics of the Syrian War” https://corbettreport.com/interview-738-sharmine-narwani-on-the-geopolitics-of-the-syrian-war/ - Sep 3, 2013

Corbett, James (2016) - “Interview 1173 – Tim Anderson Exposes the Dirty War on Syria” https://corbettreport.com/interview-1173-tim-anderson-exposes-the-dirty-war-on-syria/ - May 26, 2016

Corbett, James (2024a) - “Episode 469 – A Brief History of the War on Syria” https://corbettreport.com/a-brief-history-of-the-war-on-syria/ - Dec 11, 2024 - Archive: https://archive.ph/tyQii

Corbett, James (2024b) - “The Fall of Syria: What You Need to Know” https://corbettreport.com/the-fall-of-syria-what-you-need-to-know/ - Dec 15, 2024 - Archive: https://archive.ph/nKEG8

Corbett, James (2024c) - “Interview 1922 – Making Sense of Syria on The Last American Vagabond” https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/james-corbett-interview-12-18-24/ and https://corbettreport.com/making-sense-of-syria/ - Dec 21, 2024 - Archive: https://archive.ph/yAt9N

Courage Foundation (2019) “Panel Criticizes ‘Unacceptable Practices’ in the OPCW’s investigation of the Alleged Chemical Attack in Douma, Syria on April 7th 2018” - October 23, 2019 https://www.couragefound.org/2019/10/opcw-panel-statement/ - Archive: https://archive.ph/dUPVn

Based on the whistleblower’s extensive presentation, including internal emails, text exchanges and suppressed draft reports, we are unanimous in expressing our alarm over unacceptable practices in the investigation of the alleged chemical attack in Douma, near the Syrian capital of Damascus on 7 April 2018. We became convinced by the testimony that key information about chemical analyses, toxicology consultations, ballistics studies, and witness testimonies was suppressed, ostensibly to favor a preordained conclusion.

Courage Foundation (2021) “FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Leading International Voices and Chemical Weapons Experts Call for Accountability and Transparency at the OPCW” - 12 March 2021 https://www.couragefound.org/press-release/press-release-leading-international-voices-and-chemical-weapons-experts-call-for-accountability-and-transparency-at-the-opcw/ - Archive: https://archive.ph/AKkif

Cradle (2024a) - “Iraq boosts security on Syrian border after US proxies free hundreds of ISIS fighters” https://thecradle.co/articles-id/26216 - Aug 1, 2024

Officials from Mosul say the released ISIS fighters have been ‘dispersed along the Iraqi borders’ with no monitoring

Cradle (2024b) - “Abu Mohammad al-Julani: Putting lipstick on a pig” https://thecradle.co/articles/abu-mohammad-al-julani-putting-lipstick-on-a-pig - Dec 13, 2024

Julani’s rise from Al-Qaeda affiliate to a western-recognized ‘moderate’ leader exemplifies how geopolitics trumps ideology. For years, the west has pretended to fight terrorism while leveraging Julani and his vast Al-Qaeda and ISIS-linked terror network to destabilize Syria.

This past July, American-backed Kurds released around 1,500 ISIS prisoners from detention camps, which the US military describes as an ISIS “army in waiting.”

Cradle (2024c) “US officials say ‘massive ISIS jailbreak’ possible if Turkish-backed offensive continues in north Syria” https://thecradle.co/articles-id/28135 - Dec 19, 2024

Extremist groups that seized power in Damascus with the backing of Ankara and Washington have been clashing with Kurdish militias who control dozens of prisons holding thousands of ISIS fighters

Cradle (2025) “Syria ‘open for foreign investment,’ FM says at Davos: Syrian FM Asaad Hassan al-Shibani, a founder of Al-Qaeda in Syria, held a dialogue with Iraq war architect, former UK prime minister Tony Blair” - Jan 23, 2025 - https://thecradle.co/articles-id/28582 - Archive: https://archive.ph/Q6Ndz

“Syria’s economic resources are diverse, and we have a lot of sectors – industry, tourism … of course, the economy in the future will be open and will open the road for foreign investment,” he said at the World Economic Forum (WEF) meeting in Davos, Switzerland.

Syria's Foreign Minister Al Shibani with Tony Blair

Syria’s Foreign Minister Asaad Hassan Al Shibani speaks with former British Prime Minister Tony Blair during the 55th annual World Economic Forum (WEF) meeting in Davos, Switzerland, January 22, 2025. REUTERS/Yves Herman

Crooke, Alastair (2025) “Imperial hubris (and its consequences) in Syria” - Strategic Culture Foundation - January 1, 2025 https://strategic-culture.su/news/2025/01/01/imperial-hubris-and-its-consequences-in-syria/ - Archive: https://archive.ph/Xax0f

Erdogan now indisputably ‘owns’ ‘former-Syria’. Ottoman irredentist sentiment is ecstatic and demanding more Turkish revanchism. Others – the more secular city dwellers of Turkey however – are less enthused by the display of Turkish religious nationalism.

Erdogan however, may well be (or may soon be) experiencing buyer’s remorse: Yes, Turkey stands tall as Syria’s new landlord, but he is now ‘the responsible’ for what happens next. (HTS is plainly exposed as a Turkish proxy). Minorities are being killed; brutal sectarian executions are accelerating; sectarianism becoming more extreme. There is still no Syrian economy in sight; no revenues, and no fuel for the gasoline refinery (previously supplied by Iran).

Dahl, Edgar W. - “Detention operations in Iraq: Not what you think” By Command Sgt. Maj. Edgar W. Dahl https://www.dvidshub.net/news/21610/detention-operations-iraq-not-you-think - Task Force Bucca Public Affairs Office - 07.18.2008 - PR by Multi-National Corps Iraq Public Affairs

Durgham, Nader (2025) - “US plans to withdraw all troops from Syria, report says: The move prompted by President Trump would leave US-backed Kurdish forces facing an uncertain future” https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/us-plans-withdraw-all-troops-syria-report-says - 5 February 2025

Kit Klarenberg (2024) “Privatizing Syria: US Plans to Sell Off a Nation’s Wealth After Assad” - Mint Press News - December 17th, 2024 https://www.mintpressnews.com/privatizing-syria-us-plans-to-sell-off-a-nations-wealth-after-assad/288843/ - Archive: https://archive.ph/XUCfQ

In Syria’s protracted political and economic dismantling, there are eerie echoes of the U.S. Empire’s destruction of Yugoslavia throughout the 1990s. During that decade, the multiethnic socialist federation’s breakup produced bitter wars of independence in Bosnia, Croatia and Slovenia – encouraged, financed, armed, and prolonged every step by Western powers.

Krainer, Alex bio on Amazon https://www.amazon.com/stores/author/B08ZJXTPZ6/about

Alex Krainer is well known in the alterative geopolitics podcast circuit, and he made a number of apperances in early December suggesting that what may be happening in Syria is similar to what happened in Afghanistan where the US managed to involve Russia in a messy situation. Except this time we may have the reverse. Google Alex Krainer Syria Russia trap.

We will probably never find out the intent of Russia and Iran but we may end up with a messy situation regardless of what Russia and Iran intended. Here is how it could play: if the US withdraw all troops from Syria then the Kurdish forces may release AQ etc prisoners. The situation could become chaotic and that will “invite” the Israelis to move north-east and join forces with the Kurds and eventually open a corridor through Iraq to Iran. Possible and arguably plausible given Zionist aspirations for a “Greater Israel” and the possibility that some of the released fighters end up causing destabilization in Iraq.

McCoy, Terrence - “How the Islamic State evolved in an American prison” https://archive.ph/12Stu - Washington Post - November 4, 2014

Mahmoud’s assessment of Camp Bucca, which funneled 100,000 detainees through its barracks and closed months later, would prove prescient. The camp now represents an opening chapter in the history of the Islamic State — many of its leaders, including Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, were incarcerated and probably met there. According to former prison commanders, analysts and soldiers, Camp Bucca provided a unique setting for both prisoner radicalization and inmate collaboration — and was formative in the development of today’s most potent jihadist force.

Soufan Center - “IntelBrief: Avoiding the Next Camp Bucca” https://thesoufancenter.org/intelbrief-avoiding-the-next-camp-bucca/ - The Soufan Center - March 21, 2019

During the surge of the U.S. war in Iraq, tens of thousands of Iraqis were held in U.S. detention centers, including in Camp Bucca. It was within the confines of these overcrowded camps that the next iteration of terror germinated among detainees. Led by Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, these prisoners would become the future foot soldiers of the so-called Islamic State (IS). Aware of the potential of these prisoners, the group’s nascent leadership engineered a systematic and successful campaign called ‘Breaking the Walls’ that freed thousands of supporters from Iraqi-run centers. As with nearly every aspect of the cyclical ebb and flow of terrorism and counterterrorism in Iraq, the issue of overcrowded detention centers spawning another wave of terror is relevant once again. However, this time the situation could be far worse.

Welch, Michael (2025) “From the Frying Pan into the Fire? Analysis of What is Happening in Syria in 2025” - Link to full podcast audio and partial transcript. Michael Welch talks with Drago Bosnic and Laith Marouf - Global Research, January 10, 2025 https://www.globalresearch.ca/from-the-frying-pan-into-the-fire-analysis-of-what-is-happening-in-syria-in-2025/5876809 - Archive: https://archive.ph/dik86

Laith Marouf: And by the way, just for our listeners to understand, something like 70% of the population of Syria is Muslim Sunni, but the vast majority of those Muslim Sunnis, like 90% of them, are following the Sufi sects, Sufi schools, meaning mystics. They’re not followers of the orthodox schools of the Sunni Islam. And although we hear a lot about, rightly so, about the targeting of Alawi shrines and the attacks on Alawi populations and Christian sites, the vast majority of attacks on religious temples is on Muslim Sunni mosques where HTS thugs are coming in and lynching Sufi imams and appointing Wahhabi imams. …

And a few mosques in Damascus, in the old city, there was scuffles where the parishioners kicked out these Wahhabi preachers. So I’m just throwing that out just maybe to help everybody understand that the situation in Syria is not about Islam versus other religions. It’s about an imported cult, the Wahhabi cult that has been working for the CIA and the Saudi establishment, the Saudi monarchy, to poison all the Muslim countries that are defending themselves against American imperialism.

Woods, Keith (2024) “Israel’s Love Affair with Syrian Jihadis: For years, Zionists have backed the most radical elements in Syria” - Substack https://keithwoods.pub/p/israel-jihad - Archive: https://archive.ph/UOljT

Started: Sat, Jan 25, 2025

About Metagora

Posted by at No comments:

Saturday, January 18, 2025

LLM: Greenland, NATO, Russia and the Overton Window

Version 1: Sat, Jan 18, 2025

Location of Greenland (dark green) in the Kingdom of Denmark (light green)
By Based2134 - Derived from File:Kingdom of Denmark (orthographic projection).svg, CC BY-SA 4.0, Link

Denmark - Greenland (orthographic projection) - Wikimedia

Recently Donald Trump said to the effect it would be a good idea for the USA to acquire Greenland. Most Europeans oppose the idea. At the same time NATO Chief Mark Rutte said it may be necessary to cut social services in Europe in order to pay for military spending.

How could the powers that be use the idea of an “Overton Window” to persuade Europeans to agree on the USA acquiring Greenland in exchange for keeping social spending at the current levels? In other words can the Americans get Greenland as a payment so they continue supporting NATO and the war in Ukraine? Feel free to speculate.

Mistral.AI

Persuading Europeans using the Overton Window Concept

The Overton Window is a political theory that describes the range of ideas that the public will accept. By shifting this window, ideas that were once unthinkable can become mainstream. Here’s how the “powers that be” might use this concept to persuade Europeans to agree on the USA acquiring Greenland in exchange for maintaining social spending:

Step 1: Introduce the Idea

  • Initial Shock: Start by introducing the idea of the USA acquiring Greenland as a radical proposal. This will initially be met with opposition, but it begins to shift the conversation.

Step 2: Frame the Narrative

  • National Security: Emphasize the strategic importance of Greenland for NATO and European security. Highlight its geopolitical significance in the Arctic region, which is becoming increasingly important due to climate change and resource extraction.

  • Economic Benefits: Present potential economic benefits for Europe, such as increased investment in the region, job creation, and technological advancements that could come from American involvement.

Step 3: Highlight the Trade-Offs

  • Social Spending vs. Military Spending: Frame the discussion around the necessity of maintaining social spending. Present the idea that without American support, Europe may need to cut social services to fund military spending, as suggested by NATO Chief Mark Rutte.

  • American Support: Emphasize that American support for NATO and the war in Ukraine is crucial for European security. Present the acquisition of Greenland as a small price to pay for continued American backing.

Step 4: Gradual Acceptance

  • Media and Influencers: Use media outlets and influential figures to gradually normalize the idea. Start with opinion pieces and discussions that present the acquisition as a strategic move rather than a land grab.

  • Public Debates: Encourage public debates and discussions that present both sides of the argument. Over time, the idea will become more familiar and less radical.

Step 5: Present Alternatives

  • Worse Scenarios: Present scenarios where Europe has to make even greater sacrifices if they do not agree to the acquisition. This could include increased military spending, loss of American support, or economic sanctions.

  • Compromise: Frame the acquisition as a compromise that benefits both parties. Europe keeps its social spending, and the USA gains a strategic asset.

Step 6: Final Push

  • Political Endorsement: Get key political figures to endorse the idea, presenting it as a necessary step for European security and prosperity.

  • Public Referendum: If necessary, propose a public referendum to give the people a voice. By this point, the idea should be more acceptable, and the public may vote in favor.

Conclusion

By strategically using the Overton Window, the idea of the USA acquiring Greenland can be shifted from unthinkable to acceptable. The key is to frame the discussion around national security, economic benefits, and the necessity of maintaining social spending. Gradual introduction and normalization, along with presenting worse alternatives, can help persuade Europeans to agree to the acquisition.

**Note**: This is a speculative scenario and does not reflect actual political strategies or endorsements.

Claude.AI

Let me analyze this situation carefully.

Historical Context

The idea of the US acquiring Greenland emerged publicly in 2019 when then-President Trump first suggested it. Greenland is an autonomous territory of Denmark, with its own government and parliament, though Denmark maintains control over foreign policy and defense.

Key Considerations

The “Overton Window” strategy you suggest faces several fundamental obstacles:

  1. Sovereignty and Self-Determination
  • Greenland’s population has their own right to self-determination
  • The Danish constitution protects Greenland’s status
  • Neither Denmark nor Greenland’s governments have shown any interest in such a transfer
  1. NATO Framework
  • NATO is a mutual defense alliance, not a transactional arrangement
  • Military commitments are separate from territorial sovereignty
  • The alliance is based on shared democratic values and mutual interests
  1. Social Spending Context
  • European social spending and defense budgets are domestic policy matters
  • Linking them to territorial concessions would be unprecedented
  • Many Europeans view their social model as a core part of their identity

Analysis

This proposal would likely be seen as coercive diplomacy by European allies. Rather than shifting the Overton Window, it could damage transatlantic relations and NATO cohesion. It may also strengthen anti-American sentiment in Europe.

The suggestion of trading territory for military support would likely be viewed as counter to international norms and the post-WWII order that NATO was created to protect.

Additionally, Greenland’s strategic importance in the Arctic region makes it unlikely that Denmark would consider any transfer of sovereignty, regardless of potential benefits.

Would you like me to explore any specific aspect of this analysis in more detail?

Greenland

Greenland by Silje Bergum Kinsten - norden.org

Gemini

The “Overton Window” is a political theory that suggests that the range of ideas considered acceptable for public discourse can shift over time. This shift can be influenced by various factors, including media coverage, public opinion, and the actions of political elites.

In the context of the hypothetical scenario you’ve presented, the powers that be could use the Overton Window to persuade Europeans to agree on the USA acquiring Greenland in exchange for maintaining current levels of social spending in the following ways:

  1. Framing the issue:
    • Emphasize shared interests: The narrative could focus on highlighting the mutual benefits of the deal, such as increased security for Europe and economic opportunities for Greenland.
    • Downplay negative aspects: The potential drawbacks of the acquisition, such as environmental concerns or the impact on Greenland’s autonomy, could be minimized or dismissed.
    • Create a sense of urgency: The narrative could emphasize the need for a swift decision due to the deteriorating security situation in Europe.
  2. Manipulating public opinion:
    • Controlled media coverage: Pro-acquisition narratives could be amplified in mainstream media outlets, while dissenting voices could be marginalized or discredited.
    • Astroturfing: The creation of artificial grassroots movements in support of the deal could give the impression of widespread public support.
    • Opinion polls: Leaked or manipulated polls could suggest that public opinion is shifting in favor of the acquisition.
  3. Leveraging political elites:
    • Co-opting influential figures: Key politicians and opinion leaders could be persuaded to publicly endorse the deal, creating a sense of momentum.
    • Offering incentives: Financial or political rewards could be offered to those who support the acquisition.
    • Threatening consequences: Those who oppose the deal could be subtly or overtly threatened with negative consequences, such as reduced funding or political isolation.
  4. Exploiting existing anxieties:
    • Fear-mongering: The narrative could exploit existing fears about the war in Ukraine and the rise of populism to create a sense of insecurity and a need for decisive action.
    • Appealing to economic interests: The narrative could emphasize the economic benefits of the deal, such as increased trade and investment opportunities.
    • Playing on national pride: The narrative could appeal to a sense of national pride and the need to assert European power on the global stage.

By skillfully manipulating these factors, the powers that be could gradually shift the Overton Window to make the idea of the USA acquiring Greenland in exchange for maintaining current levels of social spending seem more acceptable to the European public.

It is important to note that this is a hypothetical scenario, and the actual implementation of such a strategy would depend on a variety of factors, including the political climate, public opinion, and the willingness of the parties involved to cooperate.

ChatGPT

Speculative Analysis: Using the Overton Window to Influence Greenland’s Acquisition

The Overton Window refers to the range of policies or ideas deemed acceptable for public discourse and action at any given time. To move public opinion toward accepting a controversial idea—like the U.S. acquiring Greenland in exchange for maintaining NATO funding and social services—policymakers and opinion leaders might employ a gradual, strategic approach. Below is a speculative roadmap:

1. Introduce the Concept Through Shocking Proposals

The first step in shifting the Overton Window involves presenting extreme or “unthinkable” ideas to desensitize the public to radical possibilities. For example: - High-profile U.S. leaders (e.g., Donald Trump) could revive the proposal to purchase Greenland, framing it as a strategic necessity for NATO and Arctic dominance. - Media outlets and think tanks could publish speculative pieces analyzing the potential economic and strategic benefits of Greenland’s acquisition.

This phase normalizes the discussion of Greenland’s transfer from Denmark while framing it as a serious geopolitical question.

2. Frame the Narrative as a “Win-Win”

To make the idea more palatable, proponents could frame the acquisition as beneficial for both Europe and the United States: - For Europeans: Emphasize that U.S. acquisition of Greenland would result in: - Reduced military spending obligations for Europe. - Preservation of social services by offloading defense burdens to the U.S. - Economic investments and infrastructure improvements for Greenland’s residents. - For Americans: Highlight the strategic Arctic resources and military advantages of Greenland, positioning the acquisition as essential for U.S. leadership.

By tying Greenland’s acquisition to the preservation of European social services, the narrative shifts from imperialism to pragmatic diplomacy.

3. Escalate Financial and Security Pressures

The U.S. and NATO could apply subtle pressure to create urgency: - Economic Pressure: Propose increases in European defense contributions while signaling that U.S. support for NATO may wane without “shared sacrifices.” - Security Pressure: Exaggerate external threats, such as Russian aggression or Chinese Arctic ambitions, to frame Greenland as vital to transatlantic security.

This narrative would make the acquisition seem like a practical solution to maintain NATO cohesion and deter adversaries.

4. Co-opt Greenland and Danish Leadership

Efforts could focus on swaying leadership in Greenland and Denmark: - Promise autonomy guarantees and significant economic development under U.S. governance. - Engage Greenlandic leaders with direct offers to address local challenges, such as climate adaptation, healthcare, and job creation. - Provide Denmark with significant financial compensation or trade agreements to incentivize cooperation.

By securing the consent of key stakeholders, the proposal could appear less controversial.

5. Leverage Public Opinion and Cultural Influence

Influence campaigns could target European and American public opinion: - Use media and cultural diplomacy to present the acquisition as a logical step toward a stronger, more unified NATO. - Highlight Greenland’s potential as a symbol of Arctic collaboration and environmental stewardship under U.S. leadership. - Downplay opposition by labeling critics as naive or as obstructing global security.

This approach shifts the perception of the deal from a controversial geopolitical maneuver to an altruistic and pragmatic solution.

6. Final Negotiations: Present a “No-Lose” Proposition

Once public and political elites are conditioned, the final stage could involve: - Offering Denmark and Greenland comprehensive guarantees of autonomy, cultural preservation, and long-term benefits. - Explicitly linking the deal to the maintenance of U.S. support for NATO and European welfare programs. - Framing any opposition as jeopardizing social stability and European security.

This stage emphasizes that the deal is a necessary compromise for broader stability and prosperity.

Potential Outcomes

  • Success: The U.S. could acquire Greenland, solidifying its Arctic dominance and reinforcing NATO alliances. Europe retains social spending without shouldering a larger defense burden.
  • Failure: Strong opposition from Denmark, Greenland, or European citizens could derail the plan, potentially straining NATO relationships and weakening transatlantic unity.

Ethical Considerations

While the Overton Window approach could theoretically shift public opinion, it raises significant ethical questions: - The sovereignty and self-determination of Greenland’s population. - The risk of coercion undermining democratic principles. - The broader implications of framing territorial acquisition as a transactional solution.

These considerations highlight the challenges of using such a strategy in a real-world context.

Map of Greenland

Resource Map of Greenland - Source: Financial Times

Additional resources

About Greenland

Greenland: The world’s largest island

Greenland is officially the world’s largest island that is not a continent. Home to 56,000 people, Greenland has its own extensive local government, but it is also part of the Realm of Denmark.

Facts about Greenland from the Nordic Council of Ministers (@nordenen)

Greenland has been populated for 5,000 years, by people from Arctic region and Europe. Although part of the North American continent, geopolitically the island is part of Europe.

Greenland is part of the Kingdom of Denmark but has wide-ranging autonomy, which was extended in 2009. However, this does not include foreign and security policy or currency policy. Politics in Greenland

Greenland is not a member of the EU, but has a special fisheries agreement and was accepted as one of the overseas countries and territories with special association with the EU.

Trump and Greenland

Trump’s Greenland purchase plan has been a US ambition since 1868 By Elías Thorsson, Marybeth Sandell January 6, 2025 - Archive

A Timeline of Greenland’s Ownership and U.S. Interest

Trump’s Greenland bid is really about control of the Arctic and the coming battle with China by Stefan Wolff, Prof of International Security, University of Birmingham - January 9, 2025 - The Conversation

Even without this historical background, Trump’s latest bid is less irrational today than it may have seemed back in 2019. On the one hand, Greenland is exceptionally rich in so-called “critical minerals”. According to a 2024 report in the Economist, the island has known deposits of 43 of 50 of these minerals. According to the US Department of Energy, these minerals are essential for “technologies that produce, transmit, store, and conserve energy” and have “a high risk of supply chain disruption”.

The latter certainly is a valid concern given that China – a key supplier of several critical minerals to global markets – has been increasing restrictions on its exports as part of an ongoing trade war with the US. Access to Greenland’s resources would give Washington more supply chain security and limit any leverage that China could to bring to bear.

Why Donald Trump wants Greenland: The Arctic island has long been vital to US security and its importance is only increasing by Richard Milne - FT - January 9, 2025 - Archive

Mikkel Runge Olesen, senior researcher at the Danish Institute for International Studies, said: “For the US, the problem is Chinese and Russian interest in the Arctic. The US has started to see the Arctic as a region for geopolitical competition. It’s very important for the US to keep the other great powers out of Greenland.”

What Imperialist Game Is Donald Trump Playing with Greenland? The President-elect’s brand of America First isolationism has always sat awkwardly with his Napoleonic tendencies By John Cassidy - January 13, 2025 - New Yorker

Moreover, the island and its offshore territories are believed to contain large untapped stores of fossil fuels and rare minerals that are so potentially valuable that they would attract the attention of any modern-day reincarnation of Theodore Roosevelt or Cecil Rhodes. The U.S. Geological Survey estimated that the offshore areas surrounding the island contain up to 17.5 billion barrels of oil and a hundred and forty-eight trillion cubic feet of natural gas. Among the minerals that Greenland possesses in significant quantities are many so-called rare-earth metals used in green-energy technologies, such as electric batteries, wind turbines, and high-power transmission lines.

In eyeing Greenland, Trump is echoing long-held American designs on the Arctic expanse by Colin Gordon, Prof of History, University of Iowa - January 15, 2025 - The Conversation - Archive

In 1823, President James Monroe established the principle that European powers were to defer to the United States on matters pertaining to the Western Hemisphere. While what came to be called the Monroe Doctrine and its corollaries were employed primarily to assert American interests and ambitions in Latin America, they clearly applied to northern neighbors as well.

After the German invasion of Denmark in April 1940, Secretary of State Cordell Hull made this point clear to his Danish counterpart, asserting that “Greenland is within the area embraced by the Monroe Doctrine.”

In early 1955, almost 70 years to the day before Trump’s recent speech, the Joint Chiefs of Staff proposed a more radical solution to preservation of American interests in the North Atlantic. In a memorandum for the secretary of defense, titled “Possible Acquisition of Greenland by the United States,” the military leaders reiterated the U.S. position: “Geographically, Greenland is part of the Western Hemisphere and has long been regarded so by the United States.”

The European POV

France warns Trump over military threats to take control of Greenland - RFI - Jan 8, 2025

The European Union will not tolerate threats to its borders, France’s foreign minister said, as tensions rose over Trump’s comments about the Arctic territory, which is an autonomous part of EU member Denmark.

“There is obviously no question that the European Union would let other nations of the world attack its sovereign borders, whoever they are,” Jean-Noel Barrot told France Inter radio.

‘We must stand together’: European leaders warn Trump over Greenland threat - Trump’s refusal to rule out using military force, economic coercion to seize island causes disquiet, calls for unity - Al Jazeera - 8 Jan 2025

The rebukes on Wednesday were led by German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, who said the principle of inviolability of borders applies to every country, no matter how powerful.

What Do Greenland and Macedonia Have in Common? By Biljana Vankovska - Global Research - January 15, 2025

Donald Trump’s announcement that he would “by hook or by crook” annex Greenland—essentially “liberating” it from Danish rule—immediately drew parallels to how the United States created the state of Kosovo. This process involved violating the UN Charter, bombing the then-Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (composed of Serbia and Montenegro) in 1999 under the pretext of defending human rights, and later drafting a constitution and recognizing a new state.

In short, the Serbs are already anticipating what might happen, having learned from their own experience. A part of the territory of a sovereign state was severed and placed under American protection (complete, of course, with the largest military base in the Balkans, Camp Bondsteel) until it ultimately declared independence.

Rutte and NATO

“To Prevent War, NATO Must Spend More” - Speech by NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte at the Concert Noble, Brussels - NATO - 12 Dec. 2024

Remarks by NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte at the European Parliament’s Committee on Foreign Affairs and Subcommittee on Security and Defence - NATO - 13 Jan. 2025

Rethink welfare to finance military splurge, NATO boss tells European Parliament - Politico - Jan 13, 2025

If spending doesn’t rise, then MEPs should “get out your Russian language courses or go to New Zealand.”

NATO Chief Mark Rutte calls for ‘shift to a wartime mindset’ By Sertac Aktan with AP - Euronews - Jan 15, 2025

NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte has called for an urgent “shift to a wartime mindset,” warning that the alliance’s members are not prepared enough for an increasing security threat posed by Russia.

Started: Sat, Jan 18, 2025

About Metagora

Posted by at No comments:

Wednesday, January 8, 2025

LLM: Greek Jews in Palestine

Version 1: Wed, Jan 8, 2025

Accion 10 May 1938.jpg
By Accion - Self-scanned, Public Domain, Link

Accion (Αξιον, אקסייון), Jewish newspaper of the city (10 May 1938) - Wikimedia

Before WWII thousands of European Jews moved to Palestine hoping to help establish their own country Israel. Do you have any information whether Greek Jews from Thessaloniki were part of that movement and whether they were involved in the business development of the port in Haifa? Also were any Greek Jews that joined paramilitary groups like Haganah, Irgun or Lehi?

Mistral.AI

I don’t have real-time web browsing capabilities or access to specific databases to provide the most current or detailed information. However, I can guide you on how to find academic sources and provide some general historical context based on the information available up to my last update in 2023.

Historical Context

  1. Migration of Greek Jews to Palestine:
    • Before World War II, many European Jews, including those from Greece, migrated to Palestine with the hope of establishing a Jewish state. Thessaloniki, in particular, had a significant Jewish population, many of whom were Sephardic Jews.
    • Thessaloniki’s Jewish community was one of the largest and most vibrant in Europe before the Holocaust. Many of these Jews sought refuge in Palestine due to rising anti-Semitism and the eventual Nazi occupation.
  2. Involvement in Business Development:
    • Haifa, being a major port city, was a strategic location for economic development. Jewish immigrants, including those from Greece, likely played a role in the city’s growth. However, specific details about their involvement in the port’s business development would require more detailed research.
  3. Participation in Paramilitary Groups:
    • Jewish paramilitary groups like Haganah, Irgun, and Lehi were active in Palestine during the pre-state period. These groups played crucial roles in the establishment of Israel. Greek Jews, along with Jews from other European countries, were part of these organizations.

Academic Sources

To find academic sources with bibliographic information, you can use the following strategies:

  1. University Libraries:
    • Access academic databases such as JSTOR, ProQuest, or Google Scholar through university libraries. These databases often contain scholarly articles, books, and dissertations on specific historical topics.
  2. Specialized Journals:
    • Look for journals specializing in Jewish history, Middle Eastern studies, or European migration. Examples include the Journal of Jewish Studies, Israel Studies, and Middle Eastern Studies.
  3. Books and Monographs:
    • Search for books on the history of Jewish migration to Palestine, the establishment of Israel, and the role of paramilitary groups. Some recommended authors and titles include:
      • The Jews of Thessaloniki by Rena Molho
      • The Jews of Greece by Rae Dalven
      • The Founding Myths of Israel by Zeev Sternhell
  4. Online Archives:
    • Explore online archives such as the Yad Vashem Archives, the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, and the Central Zionist Archives for primary source documents and scholarly research.

Example Search Terms

  • “Greek Jews migration Palestine”
  • “Thessaloniki Jews Haifa port”
  • “Jewish paramilitary groups Haganah Irgun Lehi”
  • “Greek Jews involvement Israel establishment”

Bibliographic Information

When searching for academic sources, look for the following bibliographic details:

  • Author: The name of the person who wrote the article or book.
  • Title: The title of the article or book.
  • Journal/Publisher: The name of the journal or publisher.
  • Year: The year the article or book was published.
  • Volume/Issue: The volume and issue number for journal articles.
  • Pages: The specific pages where the information can be found.

By using these strategies and search terms, you should be able to find detailed academic sources on the migration of Greek Jews to Palestine, their involvement in business development, and their participation in paramilitary groups.

Salonica Jewish Fire Department May 11 1911 Fire Chief Selomo Barzion.jpg
By Unknown author - Ottoman postcard, Public Domain, Link

Salonica Jewish Fire Department (1911) - Wikimedia

Claude.AI

Let me share what I know about this specific historical topic while acknowledging upfront that for such a specialized question, I recommend double-checking any details I provide.

Greek Jews from Thessaloniki and Pre-WWII Palestine

From my understanding, while there was some migration of Thessaloniki Jews to Palestine before WWII, it wasn’t a major movement compared to other European Jewish communities. The Thessaloniki Jewish community, which was primarily Sephardic and had deep roots in the city’s commerce and port operations, largely remained in Greece until the Holocaust.

However, I need to point out that when it comes to specific details about: - Their involvement in Haifa port development - Participation in paramilitary organizations I don’t have enough reliable information to make definitive claims.

For researching this topic, I suggest consulting:

Please note that while I try to be accurate with citations, I cannot guarantee their complete accuracy and encourage verification:

  1. Bowman, Steven B. (2002). “The Jews of Thessaloniki, 1856-1919: A Special Case?” Ethnic Groups in the City of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki: Institute for Balkan Studies.

  2. Fleming, K.E. (2008). Greece: A Jewish History. Princeton University Press.

    • This book covers the broader context of Greek Jewish communities and their connections to Palestine.

  3. Naar, Devin E. (2016). Jewish Salonica: Between the Ottoman Empire and Modern Greece. Stanford University Press.

    • While this focuses on Thessaloniki’s Jewish community more broadly, it may contain relevant information about migration patterns.

For more specific information about this topic, I would recommend: - Consulting the Central Zionist Archives in Jerusalem - Reviewing the archives of the Jewish Community of Thessaloniki - Checking the Haifa Port Authority historical records

The intersection of Thessaloniki’s Jewish community and pre-state Israel is a fascinating but relatively understudied topic that would benefit from more detailed historical research.

Gemini

Yes, there were Greek Jews from Thessaloniki who were part of the Zionist movement and participated in the development of the port in Haifa. They also joined paramilitary groups like Haganah, Irgun, and Lehi.

Here are some academic sources that provide more information:

  • The Jews of Thessaloniki: Between the Empires (1912-1941) by Dan Georgakas. This book provides a comprehensive history of the Jewish community in Thessaloniki during the interwar period, including their involvement in the Zionist movement and their emigration to Palestine.
  • Thessaloniki: History of a City by Marc Mazower. This book covers the history of Thessaloniki from its Ottoman origins to the present day, including the role of the Jewish community in the city’s economic and cultural life.
  • Zionism and the Politics of Jewish Identity in Interwar Europe by Steven Beller. This book examines the development of Zionist ideology and the political movements that emerged from it, including the role of Jewish communities in different countries, such as Thessaloniki.
  • The Port of Haifa: A History by Arie Shapira. This book provides a detailed history of the port of Haifa, including the role of Jewish immigrants from different countries, including Thessaloniki, in its development.

In addition to these books, there are also many articles and essays that discuss the role of Greek Jews in the Zionist movement and the development of Israel. You can find these articles in academic journals and online databases such as JSTOR and Google Scholar.

Workers March in Salonica 1908 - 1909.jpg
By Unknown author - [1], Public Domain, Link

Jewish workers of the Socialist Workers’ Federation march, 1908-1909 - Wikimedia

ChatGPT

Before World War II, a significant number of Jews from Thessaloniki (Salonika), Greece, emigrated to Mandatory Palestine, contributing notably to the development of the port of Haifa. Their expertise in maritime and port operations, honed in Thessaloniki—a city with a substantial Jewish population engaged in port activities—was instrumental in establishing Jewish labor in Haifa’s port. Between 1933 and 1935, dozens of Salonikan longshoremen immigrated to Palestine with the aim of establishing ‘Jewish labor’ in the port of Haifa.

Regarding involvement in Jewish paramilitary organizations such as the Haganah, Irgun, or Lehi, specific documentation of Greek Jews from Thessaloniki participating in these groups is limited. While these organizations were active in the Jewish insurgency against British rule in Palestine, detailed records identifying members’ origins are scarce. Therefore, it is challenging to confirm the extent of participation, if any, of Thessalonikan Jews in these groups.

For further academic exploration of these topics, consider the following sources:

These sources offer detailed insights into the migration of Thessalonikan Jews to Palestine, their contributions to the development of Haifa’s port, and the broader context of Jewish paramilitary activities during that period.

Started: Wed, Jan 8, 2025

About Metagora

Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)